Warriors Game Today: Steve Kerr reignites the push to cut 10 games as Bulls visit
warriors game today is set against a wider debate Steve Kerr has been pressing for years: whether the NBA should shrink the regular-season schedule to improve quality of play and reduce injuries, even if it means less revenue.
What Happens When Warriors Game Today becomes a platform for a 10-game cut?
Before Golden State hosted the Chicago Bulls on Tuesday, Kerr again advocated removing 10 games from the regular-season calendar, calling the change “obvious” if the league wants a “more competitive and healthier” product. He acknowledged the stance is unlikely to be popular with the league office and that the central obstacle is financial.
Kerr’s message was consistent across his latest comments: fewer games would help player health and availability, and the league’s overall quality. He stressed that agreeing to a shorter season would require everyone to accept less revenue, describing that trade-off as difficult. In Kerr’s framing, the long-term value lies in quality, not sheer volume.
He also tied the schedule issue to how the game is played today, pointing to the challenge of sustaining performance with modern “pace and space. ” His view is that a reduced schedule would allow teams to be fresher more often, supporting better competition and healthier outcomes.
What If the revenue-versus-quality argument defines the next phase of the schedule debate?
Kerr did not present the schedule question as an easy fix. He repeatedly highlighted that the league’s goal is to maximize revenue, and that reducing games would run directly against that incentive. Still, he argued the league should be willing to sacrifice some revenue for long-term health, implying that “more” does not automatically translate into better outcomes if the product suffers.
He also broadened the potential impact beyond injuries, saying limiting the schedule could improve multiple issues at once: player health, player availability, and tanking. In his view, quality of play would rise with additional practice time and a fresher roster, noting teams “don’t practice much at all” under the current demands.
Those remarks came after Kerr was asked in Utah what he would do if he were in the commissioner’s seat. He characterized the topic as controversial but said he plans to keep speaking because he believes it is important for the league’s long-term health.
What Happens When the pushback goes mainstream?
Kerr’s latest plea also collided with a high-profile on-air critique from Stephen A. Smith, who reacted to the idea of a 72-game schedule and said he was “incredibly disappointed. ” Smith called Kerr “hypocritical” while referencing the NBA’s new $7 billion per season media-rights deal that took effect this season, arguing that workload reductions without addressing money would be unfair.
In response, Kerr said he had not seen the segment, but he pushed back on the premise. He reiterated that he has been straightforward about the financial consequences, saying he understands it is “a question of revenue” and that improving the product would require making less revenue. Kerr framed the choice as uncomfortable but necessary, again returning to the idea that long-term quality should be the priority.
On the court, Golden State entered this stretch after a 129-126 loss to Utah on Monday night with a depleted roster. The Warriors were without Steph Curry (runner’s knee), Jimmy Butler (ACL), Al Horford (rest), Moses Moody (wrist), and Kristaps Porzingis (rest). As warriors game today arrives with Chicago in town, Kerr’s schedule argument is again intertwined with the realities of availability and the strain of an NBA season.
