Marlon Humphrey criticized after Ravens' 35-13 loss and three missed tackles

Marlon Humphrey drew criticism after the Ravens' 35-13 loss to the Bengals, with missed tackles and coverage issues under the spotlight.

Published
3 Min Read
Marlon Humphrey criticized after Ravens' 35-13 loss and three missed tackles

For the Baltimore Ravens, Week 7 was supposed to be about proving a standard. Instead, it became a reminder that even a defense built around veteran credibility can unravel fast when the details go missing. Marlon Humphrey was at the center of that conversation after a 35-13 loss to the Cincinnati Bengals, and the criticism landed because it was about more than one bad snap.

- Advertisement -

The issue was the sequence, the effort and the broader collapse around it. Humphrey was criticized after a missed tackle sequence, including the moment in which he was said not to have gotten off his knees to finish the play. Josh Tolentino posted on X the next day and made the point forcefully: as the Bengals piled up five straight touchdowns, Humphrey could not be bothered to get up and try to complete the stop. That kind of image tends to stick, especially when it comes in a loss that already looked ugly on the scoreboard.

The numbers make the criticism harder to brush aside. Through seven games in 2026, Humphrey had allowed 313 receiving yards in coverage, including an NFL-worst 176 yards in the fourth quarter. In a game that ended 35-13, Baltimore was already dealing with a defense that could not stop the bleeding late, and Humphrey’s three missed tackles only added to the perception that the Ravens' secondary was not playing to standard.

A veteran standard under pressure

This is what made the reaction sting for Baltimore. Humphrey is not being treated like a fringe piece or a young player still learning the league. He is a veteran leader with four Pro Bowl nods and two first-team All-Pro designations, which means the expectation is higher than simple competence. When Jesse Minter talks about being at our best when our best is needed, that is the exact standard the Ravens were supposed to meet in a divisional game like this.

The problem is that the Ravens did not just lose. They were overwhelmed, and the second half offered little resistance as Cincinnati scored five straight touchdowns. That kind of run exposes every weakness in a secondary, but it also exposes a team’s urgency. The Ravens' defense is supposed to be a strength. On Sunday, October 25, it looked like a unit searching for answers instead of imposing its own.

- Advertisement -

There is still a difference between one frustrating performance and a full verdict on a player’s season. Humphrey has too much history, and Baltimore has too much football left, for one game to define everything. But the concern is real because this was not only about getting beaten in coverage. It was about effort, finishing the play and a veteran cornerback becoming a symbol of the Ravens' failure to meet the moment.

That is why the criticism has moved beyond the box score. The Ravens lost on Sunday, October 25, but the bigger story is whether their supposed strength in the back end can still be trusted when the game turns into a stress test. Right now, that answer is not a comfortable one.

Advertisement
TAGGED:
Share This Article
Sports reporter covering women's athletics, college sports, and the Olympics. Advocate for equal coverage in sports journalism.