An Egyptian court in Badr city ordered the inclusion of 35 organizations and 36 individuals on Egypt’s lists of terrorist entities and terrorists for five years, with the Muslim Association of Britain named in the headline attached to the ruling. The order came on Tuesday, 10 November, from the Second Criminal Circuit of the Cairo Criminal Court sitting as a court of first instance.
The ruling came in Case No. 11108 of 2026, registered with the Supreme State Security Prosecution. For readers trying to understand what changed, the court action extends a terrorism designation across a wide group for a fixed five-year period rather than a short administrative step.
Second Criminal Circuit of the Cairo Criminal Court
The Second Criminal Circuit of the Cairo Criminal Court issued the order in Badr city, Cairo. The court acted as a court of first instance, which means the designation was made at the trial-court level rather than after a later appeal stage.
That procedural point matters because the designation takes effect through a court ruling tied to a numbered case, not through a general statement. Case No. 11108 of 2026 is the formal track through which the 35 organizations and 36 individuals were added to the lists.
Egypt terrorist lists
The ruling places the listed organizations and individuals on Egypt’s terrorist entities and terrorists lists for five years. The article text available here does not identify the 35 organizations or the 36 individuals, so the scope is broad but the names are absent from the available record.
For anyone trying to map the effect, that omission is the practical friction in the story: the court has imposed a large-scale designation, but the public-facing details in the material provided stop at the count, the court, and the duration. The source presents the ruling as part of a broader terrorism-related legal case in Egypt.
Case No. 11108 of 2026
The immediate consequence is a five-year legal designation covering 71 listed targets in total. The next step in the record is the court order itself; no further action is set out in the provided facts, and the unresolved question is which organizations and individuals were specifically included in the designation.
