Judge Rejects Gaiman Lawsuit

A Wisconsin judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by Scarlett Pavlovich against notable author Neil Gaiman and musician Amanda Palmer. The case included serious allegations such as human trafficking, assault and battery, infliction of emotional distress, and negligence.
Judge’s Ruling on Gaiman Lawsuit
The dismissal occurred on procedural grounds. The presiding judge noted that while Pavlovich’s claims are “serious and disturbing,” the court’s focus was not on the truth of those allegations.
Jurisdictional Concerns
Gaiman argued that the lawsuit should not be tried in the United States. He emphasized that the incidents in question took place in New Zealand, where both Pavlovich holds citizenship and the alleged events occurred. Gaiman also pointed out that the Trafficking Victims Protection Act is not applicable to actions occurring outside U.S. territory.
- Key points from the ruling:
- The only connection to the U.S. was Gaiman’s residence in Wisconsin.
- The judge deemed New Zealand a more suitable venue for the dispute.
- The court dismissed the case without prejudice.
Future Options for Pavlovich
The judge noted that if Pavlovich decides to pursue legal action in New Zealand and encounters issues with service, she could seek to reopen the case in Wisconsin. This ruling highlights the importance of jurisdiction in legal disputes, particularly those involving international elements.
For more details on the judge’s decision, the complete court document is available for review.