Judge Halts Donna Adelson, Citing Grievance Concerns

In a significant ruling, Judge Stephen Everett sentenced Donna Adelson to life in prison for her role in the murder-for-hire of Dan Markel. This decision was issued on October 13, 2025, in Tallahassee, Florida, during a tense court hearing. Adelson was found guilty in September, marking her as the fifth person convicted in connection with Markel’s tragic death.

Details of the Case Against Donna Adelson

Dan Markel, an FSU law professor, was shot outside his home in 2014. The jury concluded that Donna Adelson conspired to facilitate this crime by financing the hitmen and involving her son, Charlie Adelson, and his ex-girlfriend.

Emotional Statements in Court

During her sentencing, a visibly emotional Adelson expressed her innocence. She began by sharing heartfelt remarks about Markel, describing him as a “fine and decent man” and a loving father. However, she quickly shifted her tone, denying any involvement in the crime.

• Donna maintained that she had no prior knowledge of the murder plot.
• She questioned the evidence presented during her trial, asking, “Where is the evidence?”
• Judge Everett admonished her attempts to re-argue her case, noting her lack of remorse.

Support from Family and Friends

Adelson’s husband, Harvey, publicly defended her, claiming that she was a victim of unjust punishment. He characterized the proceedings as motivated by vengeance rather than justice.

In addition to her husband’s statements, seven letters from friends were submitted to the court. These letters praised Adelson’s character, describing her as “kindhearted, generous, loving, and caring.” Supporters expressed their belief in her innocence, stating she is “incapable of threatening or harming anyone.”

Legal Consequences Following the Conviction

Judge Everett ultimately imposed a life sentence without the possibility of parole, followed by an additional 30 years for Adelson. This sentence encompasses her convictions for first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and solicitation.

Despite her conviction, Adelson’s legal team submitted a motion for a new trial, which was quickly denied. The ramifications of this case continue to unfold, raising questions about justice and accountability in the context of family involvement in crime.