Lord Faces Ban for Discussing Speeding Fines with Police Chief
Baroness D’Souza faces a potential eight-week suspension from the House of Lords due to her attempt to discuss speeding fines with the Metropolitan Police Chief, Sir Mark Rowley. This situation has raised significant concerns about public trust in parliamentary members and the integrity of institutions serving the public interest.
Details of the Incident
In her communication, Baroness D’Souza expressed concern over accumulating 12 points on her driving license, which would lead to its revocation. She highlighted her living circumstances, stating, “I live deep in the countryside with no local bus services and unsuitable train schedules.”
Controversial Letter to Police Chief
- Baroness D’Souza questioned the accuracy of speed measurements, contemplating whether a discrepancy between her speedometer and police radar was justifiable.
- She sent her letter on House of Lords stationery, citing previous meetings with Sir Mark, which further complicates perceptions of her intentions.
Reaction and Consequences
The Metropolitan Police forwarded her letter to the House of Lords’ Commissioner for Standards, leading to the recommendation for suspension. The grounds for punishment stemmed from her seeking personal benefit through inappropriate channels.
- Her driving disqualification began on July 16.
- Since her disqualification, she participated marginally in parliamentary activities: speaking once and voting twice.
Baroness D’Souza’s Response
While denying any attempt to sway the police investigation, Baroness D’Souza admitted her actions were “inappropriate.” She expressed remorse for sending the letter and appealed against the suspension, labeling it as “unduly severe” compared to penalties for other misconduct such as bullying.
Next Steps
The report regarding Baroness D’Souza’s conduct will be presented to the House of Lords for consideration. If approved, the proposed suspension will be enacted immediately.
This case highlights ongoing discussions regarding the standards expected of parliamentarians and the repercussions of actions perceived as self-serving.
