Trump’s World Cup Threat: Could He Really Relocate Matches?
Former President Donald Trump’s recent comments have created waves regarding the future of World Cup matches in the United States. On two occasions, Trump hinted at the possibility of relocating games due to political tensions with host cities. Specifically, he has targeted cities that he believes are not aligned with his views.
Trump’s Comments on World Cup Relocation
On September 25, Trump was questioned during a press conference about cities like Seattle and San Francisco that have protested his administration’s policies. He noted, “I guess, but we’re going to make sure they’re safe,” after a reporter asked if these protests could jeopardize World Cup matches. Trump criticized the leadership of these cities, labeling them as controlled by “radical left lunatics.”
On October 14, during another press event, he brought up Boston as a potential host city for relocation, referencing recent incidents of violence. He stated, “We could take them away,” in response to concerns about safety in Boston, where some matches are scheduled in Foxborough. He further described Boston’s mayor as “not good” and asserted, “She’s radical left.”
Is Trump’s Threat Feasible?
Despite Trump’s vocal threats, the power to shift World Cup venues lies primarily with FIFA, not the U.S. president. Agreements for hosting are made between FIFA and local governments. While Trump can exert pressure—such as through potential federal funding withdrawals—the ultimate decision rests within FIFA’s jurisdiction.
There are specific clauses in host city agreements that address safety standards. For instance, cities like Seattle are obligated to meet certain security conditions. This stipulation could theoretically allow FIFA to revoke a city’s host status if they fail to comply with safety regulations.
Government’s Role in World Cup Preparations
The U.S. government’s influence has predominantly been promotional. Trump established a World Cup task force aimed at facilitating event preparations. Additionally, public safety will involve federal oversight, likely including FBI and Homeland Security presence in host cities.
- Eric Giuliani heads the World Cup task force.
- Federal agencies will include FBI and ICE in the security framework.
Responses to Trump’s Threat
FIFA President Gianni Infantino has not made public statements regarding Trump’s comments. However, FIFA Vice President Victor Montagliani articulated that “it’s FIFA’s tournament, FIFA’s jurisdiction,” emphasizing that football transcends political disputes.
Boston’s Mayor Michelle Wu openly dismissed Trump’s threats. She emphasized that host city agreements are solidified by contracts that are not easily overturned by presidential influence.
Historical Context of Event Relocation
Historically, FIFA has moved events only under extreme circumstances, such as health crises or significant political unrest. For instance, the 2003 Women’s World Cup was relocated from China to the U.S. due to the SARS outbreak. Such precedents suggest that while Trump’s threats carry some weight, the actual relocation of World Cup games remains highly unlikely.
As the discussion evolves, it remains to be seen what impact Trump’s rhetoric will have on the preparations for the 2026 World Cup. The complexities involved highlight the delicate balance of politics and international sporting events in today’s landscape.
