Russell Crowe Stars as Hitler’s Deputy in New Film – DW

Russell Crowe takes center stage in the new film “Nuremberg,” portraying Hermann Göring, a high-ranking Nazi official. Directed by James Vanderbilt, the film opens on Friday and delves into the themes of evil and moral fragility through its psychological thriller lens. Unlike previous portrayals, this film shifts focus from a traditional courtroom drama to the complex psychological evaluation of Nazi leaders.

Nuremberg Trials: A Historical Context

The film is inspired by Jack El-Hai’s nonfiction book “The Nazi and the Psychiatrist.” It centers on the interactions between Göring and Army psychologist Lt. Col. Douglas Kelley, played by Rami Malek. Kelley must assess whether Göring is mentally fit to stand trial, raising profound questions about human nature and evil.

Key Historical Events

• The Nuremberg Trials took place from November 20, 1945, to October 1, 1946.
• Twenty-two top Nazi leaders and six organizations were prosecuted.
• This year marks the 80th anniversary of the trials.

The Film’s Implications

Vanderbilt’s “Nuremberg” aims to remind audiences of the larger moral implications surrounding justice and accountability. Kelley, who believes that the potential for evil exists in every society, introduces the unsettling realization that history might repeat itself.

The Unsettling Relevance Today

The film arrives at a time when the ideology of Nazism is resurfacing, posing questions of vigilance about human rights and justice globally. Despite its polished production, “Nuremberg” has received critiques for glossing over the deeper implications of its narrative.

• The portrayal of Göring by Crowe is marked by charisma and complexity.
• The film emphasizes the stark contrast between its artistic delivery and the grim realities it covers, particularly the horrific images conveyed during the trial.

Comparative Analysis with Previous Works

The film draws comparisons to previous cinematic treatments of the trials, such as Stanley Kramer’s 1961 “Judgment at Nuremberg.” While Kramer’s film engaged its audience on a critical level, Vanderbilt’s version appears to shy away from fully confronting the uncomfortable questions about complicity and morality.

In essence, “Nuremberg” engages with significant historical themes while also reflecting current issues in international justice. However, its ability to evoke a strong moral reckoning remains a point of contention.