Find Out Your Councillor’s Stance Before Lansdowne 2.0 Final Vote

The Lansdowne 2.0 redevelopment plan is poised for a decisive vote at Ottawa’s city council. As the final decision approaches, many councillors have publicly expressed their stances, with only a few remaining undecided. The implications of this project are significant for the future of Lansdowne Park and the city as a whole.

Councillor Positions on Lansdowne 2.0

Here’s an overview of key councillors’ positions as the vote draws near:

• Mark Sutcliffe (Mayor): Strongly supports the plan, stating that inaction poses greater risks and costs.
• Laura Dudas (Orléans West-Innes): Advocates for the project, emphasizing that cancellation would not free funds as suggested by some critics.
• David Hill (Barrhaven West): Supports the project, citing significant risks associated with a no vote.
• Cathy Curry (Kanata North): Supports Lansdowne 2.0, prioritizing responsible use of taxpayer money.
• Clarke Kelly (West Carleton-March): Currently plans to support the staff recommendation, pending further discussions.
• Glen Gower (Stittsville): Supports the project with hopes for adjustments.

Opposition Perspectives

While many councillors favor the redevelopment, a notable group remains firmly opposed:

• Theresa Kavanagh (Bay): Questions the financial viability of the project.
• Laine Johnson (College): Believes the city should avoid risking taxpayer money.
• Sean Devine (Knoxdale-Merivale): Cites low constituent support and financial concerns as reasons for opposition.
• Jessica Bradley (Gloucester-Southgate): Critiques the project for demanding heavy financial commitments without adequate public benefit.
• Shawn Menard (Capital): Argues against the financial strategy and overemphasis on risk.

Remaining Questions and Future Implications

As the vote approaches, the dynamics within the council reflect a mix of commitment to revitalization and concern for financial responsibility. Some councillors, like Marty Carr (Alta Vista) and Allan Hubley (Kanata South), have not publicly declared their votes and emphasize the need for thorough discussion.

The Lansdowne Park redevelopment has stirred considerable debate among councillors, reflecting varied perspectives on financial strategy, public benefit, and the role of community input in shaping local projects. The outcome of the vote will have lasting effects on the city’s approach to urban development and asset management.

With a final vote looming, residents and stakeholders are keenly awaiting the council’s decision on Lansdowne 2.0, urging their representatives to carefully consider their constituents’ needs and the long-term vision for Ottawa.