Lavrov’s Absence Triggers Alarm in Moscow
The absence of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov from a significant meeting in Moscow has raised concerns about his standing within the Russian government. Recently, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov addressed media speculation regarding Lavrov’s future, affirming his continued role as foreign minister.
Background of Lavrov’s Absence
Lavrov missed a key Russian Security Council meeting held on Wednesday, where President Vladimir Putin discussed the potential of nuclear testing. His absence was particularly notable as he was the only permanent member of the Security Council not present.
- Meeting Date: Wednesday
- President: Vladimir Putin
- Rumored Event: Potential full-scale nuclear testing
Media outlets, including the Russian daily Kommersant, reported that Lavrov’s absence was “by agreement.” This has led to questions about his relationship with Putin and speculations of a government reshuffle.
Key Developments Following the Absence
In a surprise announcement on November 4, Putin appointed Deputy Chief of Staff Maxim Oreshkin to lead the Russian delegation to the G20 summit in Johannesburg, rather than Lavrov. This decision further fueled rumors about Lavrov’s status in the Kremlin.
Lavrov’s absence coincides with diplomatic challenges. A couple of weeks prior, efforts for a summit between Putin and former President Donald Trump in Budapest collapsed. Lavrov was instrumental in planning this meeting, but it was halted after communications with U.S. officials.
- New Appointment: Maxim Oreshkin to lead G20 summit delegation
- Previous Attempt: Summit with Trump in Budapest
- Reason for Cancellation: Lack of cooperation on Ukraine
Lavrov’s Career and Reputation
Sergey Lavrov has been a prominent figure in Russian diplomacy for over two decades. His tenure has been marked by critical events, including the 2008 Russo-Georgian war and the annexation of Crimea in 2014. He has been a staunch supporter of the recent invasion of Ukraine.
At 75 years old, Lavrov’s confrontational diplomatic style reflects the broader imperial aspirations of Russia under Putin. Despite recent setbacks, the Kremlin has historically valued loyalty and continuity over outright dismissals. For instance, former Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu was reassigned rather than replaced.
In conclusion, while Lavrov’s absence from significant meetings raises alarms about his position, it seems the Kremlin’s strategy may lean towards maintaining established figures rather than engaging in drastic changes.
