Ruby Rose Criticizes Sydney Sweeney: “You Ruined ‘Christy'”

Ruby Rose has recently criticized Sydney Sweeney, claiming she was initially set to star in the film “Christy.” The controversy follows Sweeney’s involvement in an American Eagle campaign titled “Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.” This campaign faced backlash due to its perceived promotion of eugenics, as some advertisements altered “Jeans” to “Genes.” Critics noted the implications linked to Sweeney’s appearance, and rumors about her political affiliations have also gained traction.

Ruby Rose’s Claims About “Christy”

In a series of social media posts, Ruby Rose expressed her frustrations regarding the film “Christy.” She claimed that the script was exceptional and life-changing, stating that she had been attached to play a character named Cherry. The actress mentioned that many involved with the project had personal connections to the core material, emphasizing that most were part of the LGBTQ+ community. Ruby indicated that losing roles is a common occurrence in the industry.

Concerns Over Sydney Sweeney’s Impact

Ruby Rose took issue with Sweeney’s portrayal of Christy. She accused Sydney of undermining the film’s authenticity, arguing that it is disingenuous for someone who, according to Ruby, does not resonate with the community to lead in such a significant role.

• Ruby Rose referred to Sydney Sweeney as a “cretin” and stated she “ruined the film.”
• Rose believes that the film’s potential impact was lost due to poor execution.
• The film flopped at the box office despite a 98% rating from audience members on Rotten Tomatoes.

Industry Reactions

Reacting to Ruby’s statements, someone claimed to have spoken to Christy Martin, the film’s titular character, and indicated that she disagrees with Ruby’s perspective. In response, Ruby suggested that the discrepancy in views stems from a profound “cognitive dissonance.” She argued that the intended audience for the film ultimately did not engage with it.

Sydney Sweeney’s Response

Sydney Sweeney addressed the film’s box office performance while outlining her pride in participating in the project. She reaffirmed her commitment to the film, highlighting its positive aspects and the message it aimed to convey.

The exchange between Ruby Rose and Sydney Sweeney continues to evoke discussions about casting choices and representation in film, particularly within LGBTQ+ narratives. As both actresses navigate their careers, their conflicting views may influence public perception and discourse surrounding representation in Hollywood.