Packers’ Run Game Proves Effective Against Eagles, Says LaFleur

In a recent game, the Green Bay Packers faced the Philadelphia Eagles, a matchup that highlighted some troubling statistics for the Packers’ offense. Following their loss, head coach Matt LaFleur characterized the team’s running game as “effective,” despite the running backs managing only 76 yards on 22 carries, averaging a modest 3.5 yards per attempt.

Packers’ Running Game Statistics

The Packers’ performance on the ground raises several questions. An average of 3.5 yards per carry is concerning, particularly in a league that has seen improved rushing efficiency. For context, if this trend continues, it would match the worst season-long average in 2025. In contrast, the Eagles’ defense has been vulnerable against the run, allowing 4.4 yards per carry, with 11 rushing touchdowns and 72 first downs surrendered on the ground this season. In comparison, the Packers have restricted opponents to only 47 first downs this year.

Success Rate Metrics

• Green Bay’s success rate on rushing plays against the Eagles was just 33%.
• This means they failed to gain the necessary yards on two-thirds of their run attempts.
• As a result, the Packers faced 16 third- and fourth-down plays during the game.

The previous week against the Carolina Panthers, the Packers also struggled offensively, resulting in 16 third- and fourth-down plays over just seven drives, averaging more than two per drive. Heading into the Eagles game, they had boasted a third-down conversion rate around 50%, well above the league average of approximately 33%.

According to LaFleur, such a lack of production on the ground can still be viewed as effective. However, this perspective may be risky in the long run. Relying on third- and fourth-down conversions significantly increases the dependency on successful plays, often resulting in unpredictable outcomes.

Future Implications

As the season progresses, it remains to be seen whether the Packers will maintain their performance on third downs or if their rushing game will improve. The team’s strategy must evolve to ensure reliance on successful run plays does not hinder their pursuit of victories. LaFleur’s justification of the run game might indicate a short-term strategy, but it leaves unanswered questions about sustainability moving forward.