Danny Masterson Seeks Overturn of Rape Convictions Citing Legal Errors
Actor Danny Masterson, known for his role in “That ’70s Show,” has recently moved to overturn his rape convictions. He filed a petition for habeas corpus on Monday, addressing issues from his 2023 retrial.
Danny Masterson’s Petition for Overturning Rape Convictions
Masterson, who received a prison sentence of 30 years to life for the rapes of two women in 2003, claims significant legal errors during his trial. The petition highlights the inadequate representation provided by his trial lawyer, Philip Cohen.
Key Legal Arguments
- Masterson asserts that Cohen failed to call crucial witnesses.
- Evidence that could have exonerated him was not presented.
- The petition alleges judicial bias against the Church of Scientology, to which Masterson belongs.
The filing was submitted to California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal. It asserts that Cohen spoke to only two out of 20 potential witnesses identified by co-counsel. These witnesses could have testified positively about Masterson’s relationships and the effects of substances on memory.
Judicial and Prosecutorial Concerns
The petition alleges procedural misconduct during the trial. Eric Multhaup, the attorney representing Masterson, emphasized that the second trial was marred by prosecutorial misconduct and judicial biases. He contends that the jury only received one-sided information.
- Masterson argues that the prosecution portrayed the Church of Scientology negatively.
- Evidence countering this portrayal was overlooked.
The first trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury. Masterson was retried, ultimately leading to his convictions on two counts, while the third count ended without a verdict.
Current Status and Future Steps
Masterson is currently serving his sentence at the California Men’s Colony in San Luis Obispo. His eligibility for parole is over 20 years away. The new motion is distinct from his ongoing appeal to the same court.
In conclusion, this latest development in Masterson’s legal battles reflects ongoing disputes regarding actual evidence presentation and alleged biases present during his trials. The case remains an evolving story, drawing attention to legal procedures in high-profile cases.
