Fugees Rapper Pras Michel Gets 14-Year Sentence for Illegal Obama Donations

Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, a member of the hip-hop group Fugees, was sentenced to 14 years in prison on Thursday. This sentence stems from his conviction for illegally sending millions in foreign donations to Barack Obama’s 2012 presidential campaign. Michel, 52, received this ruling from U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C.

Background on the Case

In April 2023, a federal jury found Michel guilty on 10 counts, including conspiracy and functioning as an unregistered foreign agent. The trial featured testimony from notable figures, such as actor Leonardo DiCaprio and former Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Details of the Crime

• Michel funneled over $120 million from Malaysian financier Low Taek Jho.
• Funds were directed to Obama’s campaign through straw donors.
• He attempted to obstruct a Justice Department investigation concerning Low.
• Additional charges included witness tampering and perjury.

Prosecution’s Argument

Federal prosecutors argued that Michel’s actions, driven by greed, betrayed his country. They suggested a life sentence under federal guidelines, emphasizing the severity of his crimes. They described his lies and indifference to risks posed to national security.

Defense Claims

Michel’s attorney, Peter Zeidenberg, contended that the 14-year term is excessively harsh. He proposed a three-year sentence, asserting that a life sentence would be inappropriate, reserved for severe criminal behavior like that of terrorists and drug cartel leaders.

Michel’s Legacy and Future

Michel, who grew up in Brooklyn, was part of the Fugees, recognized for their Grammy-winning music and substantial album sales. His attorneys plan to appeal the conviction and sentence. They argue that his actions were mischaracterized, claiming motivations were less about policy influence and more about personal ambition.

Trial Errors and Appeal

In August 2024, the judge dismissed Michel’s request for a retrial, stating that the use of generative AI by his defense attorney during closing arguments did not constitute a significant injustice.

As this case unfolds, Michel’s involvement in illicit political donations raises questions about campaign finance laws and accountability, marking a significant chapter in the intersection of celebrity and politics.