Candace Owens Accuses Macron Couple of Plotting Her Assassination
Candace Owens, a prominent conservative influencer, has made shocking claims regarding French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron. In a recent social media post, Owens alleged that the couple conspired to orchestrate her assassination through France’s National Gendarmerie Intervention Group (GIGN).
Candace Owens’ Alarming Accusations
Owens tweeted that she had been contacted by a high-ranking French government official, who purportedly claimed that plans for her assassination had been developed, with involvement from an Israeli individual. She asserts that the Macrons are financing this plot, aiming to eliminate her due to her political influence and outspoken views.
Concerns for Fellow Journalist
In her message, Owens expressed concern for journalist Xavier Poussard, suggesting his life is also threatened. Poussard has been known for promoting non-traditional and controversial theories about Brigitte Macron, further fueling conspiracy theories surrounding the presidential couple.
Connections to Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Allegation
Owens linked her claims to the tragic shooting of fellow conservative Charlie Kirk, who was killed recently. She alleged that his assassin had trained with a French military unit, adding to the narrative of a supposed conspiracy involving both France and the Macrons.
Previous Controversies
- Owens has faced backlash for spreading misinformation, including false claims about George Soros and Black Lives Matter protests.
- She has been criticized for her anti-vaccine stance and denying climate change, which have raised questions regarding her credibility.
Public Reaction
Public response to Owens’ comments has been mixed, with many users mocking her claims as unrealistic. Critics point out the absurdity of involving a military unit like the GIGN in a conspiracy against her.
Legal Issues with the Macron Couple
The accusations come at a time when the Macrons have initiated legal action against Owens, having filed a lawsuit for spreading “verifiable, false, and damaging” information about them.
As the story develops, it highlights the ongoing tensions between political figures and influencers in the digital age, where controversial claims quickly gain traction and provoke widespread discussion.