Michigan Football: 5 Key Concerns from the Ohio State Loss

The Michigan Wolverines faced a challenging defeat against the Ohio State Buckeyes, ending with a score of 27-9. This loss highlighted several areas of concern for Michigan, particularly as they navigated a season marked by mixed performances and a young team. Here are five key concerns that emerged from the game.

1. Underwhelming Performance from QB Bryce Underwood

True freshman quarterback Bryce Underwood struggled significantly against Ohio State. With a completion rate of only 44%, he tallied 63 passing yards, one interception, and no touchdowns. Throughout the season, Underwood started all 12 games but finished with only nine touchdowns and six interceptions. His performance in November was particularly disappointing, with two touchdowns set against four interceptions and a lost fumble over four games.

2. Defensive Disarray Against Ohio State

Michigan’s defense faced significant challenges in stopping Ohio State’s offense. The Buckeyes commanded possession for over 40 minutes, effectively controlling the game tempo. They converted 10 of 17 third-down attempts and 2 of 3 on fourth down. Michigan’s defense failed to generate any sacks or a significant pass rush, allowing Ohio State quarterback Julian Sayin to exploit weaknesses in the secondary.

3. Fizzling Out in the Second Half

Despite a one-score deficit at halftime, Michigan collapsed in the second half. They amassed only 39 total yards, failed to convert on four third-down attempts, and did not score any points. This lack of offensive production illustrated significant obstacles in stamina and execution, as Michigan was outscored 10-0 during this critical period.

4. Struggles in the Running Game

• Jordan Marshall started strong with a 36-yard run but later aggravated a shoulder injury, finishing with 61 yards on seven carries.
• Bryson Kudzdal struggled as well, notching only 38 yards on 11 carries.

Michigan’s offensive strategy became predictable, relying heavily on the run game after initial success. This approach failed to adapt, limiting the effectiveness of their offensive execution.

5. Lack of Innovative Play Calling

Offensive coordinator Chip Lindsey’s game plan was underwhelming. There were no creative plays or innovative strategies to surprise Ohio State’s defense. Michigan’s offense appeared static, which allowed Ohio State to set a dominating physical tone throughout the contest.

Moving forward, Michigan must address these concerns to revitalize their team dynamics. Improvement in quarterback play, defensive strategy, and offensive creativity will be crucial for future success.