Agency Permits Railroads to Enhance Track Inspections with Advanced Technology
The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has approved a waiver that will allow freight railroads to employ advanced technology for track inspections, reducing the frequency of human inspections. This decision follows a request from the Association of American Railroads (AAR) seeking relief from regulations established in 1971.
Advanced Technology for Track Inspections
The railroads argue that modern automated inspection technology is highly effective at identifying potential issues early. Extended tests conducted by BNSF and Norfolk Southern indicated that safety improved even when human inspections were reduced from twice weekly to twice monthly. Under the new waiver, railroads can conduct track inspections once a week instead of more frequent checks.
Inspection Requirements and Defect Repairs
- FRA requires immediate repair of serious defects found by automated systems.
- All defects must be addressed within 24 hours.
- Railroads had requested up to three days for repairs; however, the FRA did not approve this request.
Limits of Automated Inspection Technology
While the technology utilizes cameras and lasers to assess track conditions, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division has expressed concerns. They believe that crucial issues, such as shifting ballast or vegetation intrusions, may be overlooked by automated systems.
Union Concerns
Union President Tony Cardwell emphasized the importance of human oversight, stating that automated systems should complement rather than replace visual inspections. Regular human inspections enable inspectors to develop familiarity with specific track conditions, essential for identifying potential vulnerabilities.
Data Supporting Technological Efficacy
BNSF provided data indicating that the combination of automated inspections and reduced manual checks detected significantly more defects. Over a two-year comparison, manual inspections identified only 0.01 defects per 100 miles, while automated inspections found 4.54 defects per the same distance.
Focus on Manual Inspections
The railroads assert that by minimizing regular inspections, inspectors can dedicate more time to evaluating switch mechanisms and other vital equipment. Norfolk Southern noted that although typical inspections will be less frequent, special inspections will still occur following significant weather events.
Conclusion
The decision by the FRA marks a significant shift in railroad inspection practices. As technology advances, it is crucial to strike a balance between automated solutions and human expertise to maintain rail safety standards.
