Alberta Premier Smith: Courts Shouldn’t Gatekeep Constitutional Issues
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith recently expressed strong views regarding the role of courts in independence referendums. During her radio call-in show, she emphasized that citizens seeking a referendum should not face obstacles from judicial systems. Her comments come as her administration introduced a new legislative initiative aimed at suspending ongoing court cases related to this controversial topic.
Legislation Aimed at Removing Judicial Barriers
Smith’s government has proposed legislation that would grant Justice Minister Mickey Amery authority over referendum questions. She argues that this approach strengthens democratic processes by eliminating judicial gatekeeping. According to Smith, the courts appear selective about which referendums they endorse, favoring certain issues while obstructing others.
Recent Court Commentary
These comments follow a recent decision by Justice Colin Feasby of Alberta’s judiciary. Feasby ruled that a proposed separatist referendum question would contradict the Canadian Charter and existing provincial law. He characterized the government’s attempt to amend rules during an ongoing process as undemocratic.
Public Response and Future Implications
- Smith’s remarks have ignited discussions about the balance of power between the judiciary and legislative branches.
- The proposed legislation could redefine how referendums are managed in Alberta.
- This situation continues to unfold amidst a backdrop of intense political discourse in the province.
The debate over independence referendums is pivotal in Alberta’s evolving political landscape. As the situation develops, concerns about democracy and governance will remain at the forefront of public conversation.
