Amanda Seyfried Stands Firm on Calling Charlie Kirk ‘Hateful’
Amanda Seyfried has firmly defended her views on the late Charlie Kirk, whom she referred to as “hateful.” This statement was made in the wake of Kirk’s tragic death on September 10, 2023, at the age of 31, after he was fatally shot while speaking at Utah Valley University during his American Comeback Tour. In a recent interview with Who What Wear, Seyfried emphasized her right to express her opinion, stating, “What I said was pretty damn factual.”
Amanda Seyfried’s Controversial Comments on Charlie Kirk
The actress’s comments generated significant backlash online. The controversy began after she reacted to a social media post highlighting Kirk’s contentious remarks about various social issues, including abortion and immigration. In her response, Seyfried’s verified Instagram account succinctly declared, “He was hateful.”
Public Reaction and Backlash
Amanda Seyfried faced immediate criticism following her remarks. Many users called for a boycott of her films, arguing that her characterization of Kirk was unjustified. One user on social media asserted that Seyfried believed Kirk’s assassination was deserved, urging others to avoid her movies. Another commenter insisted that she had not thoroughly engaged with Kirk’s work.
Seyfried’s Defense and Advocacy for Discussion
In response to the backlash, Seyfried sought to clarify her intentions. She stated her aim was not to escalate tensions but rather to foster “spirited discourse” regarding Kirk’s controversial legacy. “I can get angry about misogyny and racist rhetoric and ALSO very much agree that Charlie Kirk’s murder was absolutely disturbing and deplorable in every way imaginable,” she articulated.
Throughout this controversy, Seyfried underscored the importance of acknowledging the complexities of humanity and the grief surrounding systemic violence in the country. “Can we agree on that at least?” she asked, highlighting the pervasive issue of violence and loss of life. Her comments reflect a duality in confronting inflammatory rhetoric while condemning violence in all its forms.
