ASCLU Senate Denies Turning Point USA Chapter Approval
The Associated Students of California Lutheran University (ASCLU) Senate recently denied the reestablishment of a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) chapter on campus. This decision was made during a meeting held on December 1, where the Senate conducted a secret-ballot vote, resulting in a 2-11-1 outcome against the approval of the club.
A crowd of over fifty students attended the meeting, creating a standing-room-only atmosphere. The club’s proposal included a request for support and resources aimed at creating a safe space for conservative students and facilitating civil dialogue.
Key Events and Comments
Tristan Quezada, a first-year student and prospective club president, emphasized the importance of allowing diverse voices on campus. He remarked, “We want their voices to be heard, even when we disagree with them.” However, the Senate was cautious, noting the potential for controversy surrounding the club.
Luke Taylor, the would-be vice president, expressed that the club had surpassed the five-member requirement necessary for Senate consideration, claiming they had seven confirmed members and interest from over 20 students. Despite this, the lack of a faculty adviser created concern regarding the club’s legitimacy.
Concerns Raised by Senators
During discussions, Senator Mathias Schmidt and others questioned the proposed chapter’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Junior Senator Nadege Adibonou raised concerns about the safety of underrepresented groups, particularly emphasizing her own experiences as a Black female senator.
- Adibonou questioned how the club would ensure a safe environment for all students.
- Julia M’kai Sayyid condemned the club’s approval efforts, labeling TPUSA as “rooted in racism.”
Some senators noted existing organizations that address similar themes, suggesting that the new club may not significantly contribute to the campus landscape.
Overall Reception and Future Considerations
The overall reception to the TPUSA chapter was mixed. While some students supported establishing a conservative presence on campus, others raised valid concerns regarding its impact.
Following the vote, it was clear that the club’s future was uncertain, with suggestions that rebranding might improve its chances for approval. Luke Taylor remarked that the organization would return “as many times as we need” to seek support.
As the discussion continues, the balance between differing ideologies and ensuring a safe environment for all students remains a crucial consideration at California Lutheran University.
