Environmental Group Sues to Halt Trump Face on National Park Passes

The introduction of a controversial design change for national park passes has ignited a legal battle. The Center for Biological Diversity has initiated a lawsuit aiming to prevent the Trump administration from featuring the former president’s face on these passes. This modification is set to take effect on January 1, 2026.

Details of the Lawsuit

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. The Center for Biological Diversity claims that federal regulations mandate the main annual pass showcase the winning image from the National Park Foundation’s annual photo contest. For the upcoming year, this winning photograph highlights the stunning Glacier National Park in Montana.

Criticism of the Design Change

Kierán Suckling, the executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, voiced strong opposition to the decision. He described Trump’s move to replace images of national parks with his own likeness as “crass” and “ego-driven.” Suckling stressed that national parks should remain untarnished by political branding, asserting they are cherished spaces for the American public.

Context of the Change

This announcement follows a recent shift in park admission policies. Earlier this month, the Trump administration revealed plans to end free admissions on Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth. Instead, they will waive fees on President Trump’s birthday, which coincides with Flag Day.

Impact on National Parks

The Department of the Interior, which manages the national parks, stated that these changes aim to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the United States. Secretary Doug Burgum expressed pride in honoring those who have contributed to the preservation of America’s natural landscapes.

• Key Dates:
  • January 1, 2026 – New park pass designs take effect.
  • Upcoming year – Featured photo from the National Park Foundation’s annual contest.
• Significant Locations:
  • Glacier National Park, Montana

The Trump administration’s decisions regarding national park policies and designs have sparked debate. As this lawsuit progresses, the future of the national park passes and their imagery hangs in the balance.