WNBA Players Demand Double Revenue Share Over League Proposal: Sources
The ongoing labor negotiations between the WNBA and its players’ union highlight significant differences in their proposals regarding revenue sharing. The Women’s National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA) has presented a strong case for players to receive a more substantial share of league revenue.
WNBA Players Demand Increased Revenue Share
Currently, the WNBPA is advocating for players to receive approximately 30% of total league and team revenue. This figure is more than double the less than 15% proposed by the WNBA in its latest salary system draft. These contrasting demands have made it challenging for both parties to reach an agreement.
Proposed Revenue Structures
The WNBPA’s proposal suggests that the salary cap would be based on the previous season’s total revenue. After deducting various player benefits, this amount would be divided among all teams. Key benefits considered in these calculations include:
- Medical insurance costs
- Local transportation expenses
- Housing allowances
In contrast, the WNBA’s approach includes a shareable metric of league revenue, with only 50% allocated to players. Details on how this metric will be defined remain unclear and do not encompass total league revenues. This proposal aims to set the average salary around $500,000 and project maximum player compensation at $1.2 million during the initial year of the agreement.
Extended Negotiation Period
Negotiations between the WNBA and WNBPA have been ongoing since they mutually agreed to extend deadlines. The current collective bargaining agreement expires on January 9. Players like Kelsey Plum have expressed frustration over the lack of progress since the last extension. Plum stated, “It’s disheartening; we’re fighting for what we deserve.”
Other Negotiation Topics
Beyond salary structures, various other issues are also on the negotiation table.
Roster Sizes
The WNBPA proposes that teams maintain a roster of 12 players at all times, with the addition of two developmental players. These developmental players would receive a stipend and could play in a limited number of games.
Season Length
The WNBPA is advocating for an increase in the number of games played in a season, moving from 44 to 48 games, and potentially 50 with league expansion. The league has even suggested an option to increase this number in coming years.
Technological Integration
Wearable technology usage during games is also under discussion. Currently, players cannot use this technology in games, but the league proposes making it mandatory next season, while the WNBPA suggests a phased approach.
Parental Leave and Mental Health
The absence of a parental leave policy for non-birthing parents has come up in conversations. The league’s proposal allows for just one week of paid leave, while the WNBPA seeks to establish four weeks. Additionally, the union proposes a reimbursement of up to $500 monthly for out-of-network mental health services, a proposal the league has yet to accept fully.
Retirement Benefits
Negotiations also involve retirement benefits for former players. Proposed solutions include a one-time payment for players with several years of experience and annual reimbursements for health examinations.
As these discussions continue, the contrast between the WNBA and WNBPA proposals reflects the ongoing need for both transparency and equity in revenue sharing. Players remain staunch in advocating for an agreement that not only meets their needs but also sets a sustainable future for women’s basketball.
