Top Scathing Book Reviews of 2025 on Literary Hub
The literary landscape of 2025 faces some striking criticisms in the form of scathing book reviews. Several high-profile releases have garnered attention, not for their literary merit, but for the strong negative reactions they inspired among critics. Here’s a summary of the most talked-about book reviews of the year.
Top Scathing Book Reviews of 2025
Louis C.K.’s *Ingram*
Louis C.K.’s debut novel, *Ingram*, has been described as lacking depth and authenticity. Critics argue that the book prioritizes concept over character, leading to a disappointing reading experience. Despite C.K.’s fame, the novel presents a narrative that feels juvenile and unrefined. Many believe this work belongs in a drawer rather than on bookstore shelves, especially given its lack of genuine emotional resonance.
Olivia Nuzzi’s *American Canto*
Olivia Nuzzi’s *American Canto* has been criticized for its convoluted structure and lack of clarity. The book, which dives into personal and political experiences, has been labeled as nearly illegible. Critics highlight its chaotic narrative style, comparing its impact to a delusional fortune cookie. The lack of insight into both Nuzzi’s character and political commentary leaves readers frustrated.
Mitch Albom’s *Twice*
Mitch Albom’s latest novel, *Twice*, tells the story of a man able to revisit past choices. However, critics found the plot unengaging and the writing uninspired. Many suggest that the protagonist’s ability to alter his fate removes any sense of urgency or emotional weight from the story. The familiar tropes and recycled lines did not resonate well with readers.
Karine Jean-Pierre’s *Independent*
Karine Jean-Pierre’s *Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House* has been criticized for its lack of substantive critique and reliance on clichés. The book’s tone has been described as more suited to a motivational speaker than a political figure. Critics argue that it fails to offer a clear analysis of contemporary Democratic policies, rendering it ineffective and dated before its release.
Woody Allen’s *What’s With Baum?*
Woody Allen’s debut novel has been met with disdain for its superficial exploration of deeper themes. Critics argue that the autofiction fails to deliver engaging prose, with most insights appearing sparse and underdeveloped. The narrative has been perceived as riddled with self-absorption, leading to questions about its purpose and literary value.
Alexander Karp’s *The Technological Republic*
Alexander Karp’s *The Technological Republic* has evoked skepticism for its self-indulgent arguments and unoriginal prose. Karp’s attempt to insert himself into philosophical discussions about Western civilization comes across as insincere. Critics label the book as muddled and disconnected from the very concerns it claims to address.
Harper Lee’s *The Land of Sweet Forevers*
The posthumous collection of Harper Lee’s works, *The Land of Sweet Forevers*, has been deemed disappointing. Critics suggest that the published pieces lack depth and fail to represent Lee’s literary legacy authentically. The book’s contents do not reveal anything significant about the author, leading reviewers to lament its release.
John Fetterman’s *Unfettered*
John Fetterman’s memoir has been criticized for being uninspired and lacking in substance. It has been described as boring, falling short of providing any new insights into his political career or personal experiences. Critics suggest that the book does not resonate with readers looking for a compelling narrative.
Taylor Jenkins Reid’s *Atmosphere*
Taylor Jenkins Reid’s *Atmosphere* has been met with disappointment due to its lack of engaging content and overly simplistic messaging. Critics claim it fails to blend entertainment with substance, leaving readers unsatisfied. The protagonist’s overly polished disposition has made it difficult for audiences to connect with the story.
Kamala Harris’s *107 Days*
Kamala Harris’s *107 Days* has drawn ire for its self-referential tone and lack of introspection about her political failures. Critics argue that the book frames politics as a performative act rather than addressing systemic issues. The final takeaways suggest that the book is less about revealing truths and more about self-defense regarding past choices.
This year has seen a remarkable array of underwhelming literary contributions. The range of perspectives provided by these reviews highlights the evolving conversation around contemporary authors and their works. Readers continue to seek substance and authenticity in literature, making these critiques all the more relevant.
