Ohio University Coach’s Lawyer Cites Dating Policy in Defense of Firing

Ohio University is facing scrutiny following the firing of its head football coach, Brian Smith. His attorney, Rex H. Elliott, contended that Smith was wrongfully terminated and cited the university’s own dating policy as a defense.

Details of the Firing

Smith was placed on leave on December 1 and officially dismissed shortly after. University President Lori Gonzalez highlighted several reasons for the termination, which was classified as a for-cause dismissal. However, Elliott argued that Smith’s relationship with an undergraduate student was permissible under university guidelines.

Defense Against Allegations

• Smith’s relationship with the undergraduate student was consensual and disclosed.
• Smith’s wife and he had been separated earlier in the year.
• The relationship lasted for four months until it ended in November.

Elliott stated that the woman did not work within the athletic department and emphasized that Smith was not aware of her student status until after their initial meeting at a local establishment.

Claims in the Termination Letter

In the termination notice, Smith was accused of carrying on an affair and breaching alcohol use policies. Elliott countered that the allegations regarding alcohol consumption were exaggerated. He asserted that the practice of toasting victories in the office with bourbon was common among coaches and did not imply misconduct.

Alcohol Allegations

University documentation claimed that Smith smelled of alcohol during a public appearance and demonstrated inappropriate behavior. Elliott refuted these claims, affirming that Smith had never been inebriated at any university events.

Response from University Officials

Despite Elliott’s arguments, President Gonzalez said the university maintained sufficient grounds for firing Smith. This decision follows a season where Smith led the Bobcats to an 8-4 record, marking a promising start in his coaching tenure.

Key Takeaways

• Smith’s attorney disputes claims of misconduct related to his relationship.
• The allegations regarding alcohol use and inappropriate behavior are contested.
• The university’s dating policy appears to allow such relationships under specified conditions.

As the situation unfolds, Ohio University seems determined to uphold its decision, maintaining that the grounds for firing Smith were valid despite the ongoing defense from his legal counsel.