Blowouts in College Football Playoffs? Consider the Impact of Selective Memory
The recent trend of blowouts during College Football Playoff games has sparked discussions about perceptions and biases within the sport. Selective memory seems to shape narratives around playoff inclusivity for teams from Group of 6 conferences compared to their Power 5 counterparts.
Blowouts Highlight Disparities in College Football Playoffs
During the latest playoff season, several games showcased significant disparities between competing teams. One match featured a team taking a commanding 21-0 lead in just the first quarter, while the opponent struggled to gain momentum. Similar instances have also been noted with scores ballooning to 34–0 by the second quarter.
Historical Context of Blowouts
These instances raise questions about inclusion in playoffs. Last year’s playoff games, including Ohio State’s victories over Tennessee and Oregon, continued the trend of blowouts without major criticisms directed toward the losing teams.
Group of 6 vs. Power 5: A Double Standard?
This disparity seems to highlight a double standard. Teams from power conferences often escape harsh scrutiny after decisive losses. In contrast, Group of 6 teams face harsh criticism for similar defeats, suggesting deep-rooted biases.
- Power Conference teams: Ohio State, Tennessee, Oregon
- Group of 6 representatives: Tulane, James Madison
NCAA Championship Dynamics
In collegiate sports, typically, winning a conference provides qualification for postseason play. Yet, Group of 6 teams, like James Madison, often miss out on playoff spots not due to performance but due to systemic biases against them.
This year, only two Group of 6 teams qualified for the playoffs, largely due to irregularities within the Atlantic Coast Conference, which affected Miami’s placement.
Future of College Playoffs
Looking ahead, as the playoff expands to 16 teams, the dynamics could change drastically. Yet, with intense competition for minimal spots, challenges will persist for Group of 6 teams seeking greater representation.
Fans across the country, particularly in communities with Group of 6 schools, have shown enthusiasm and support for their teams. However, institutional biases continue to widen the gap between the haves and have-nots.
The Growing Divide in Conference Participation
Recent movements have seen several teams shifting from Group of 6 to power conferences, further depleting the pool of competitive teams in the lower tier. This trend has left the remaining Group of 6 teams fighting an uphill battle to gain visibility and respect.
As college football evolves, the conversation surrounding playoff inclusivity must grow. Every team deserves the opportunity for postseason play, and the narratives surrounding blowouts should be examined through a fair lens, avoiding selective memory.
