Supreme Court Rejects Trump in National Guard Case: NPR

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against former President Donald Trump regarding his attempt to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois. This decision was made on Tuesday, denying Trump’s request to override the governor’s objections.

Background of the Case

The Trump administration contended that federalizing the National Guard was essential to combat a rise in violence against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in the Chicago region. They argued that the protests constituted a serious threat, asserting it was a “rebellion against the United States.” However, lower courts disagreed with this viewpoint.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

In a brief opinion, the Supreme Court stated that the government did not demonstrate a legal basis for military intervention in Illinois. The court emphasized the applicability of the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts military involvement in law enforcement on American soil.

Voting Breakdown and Opinions

The majority opinion upheld the findings from both the trial court and a three-judge appellate panel. This panel included one Trump appointee, one appointed by George W. Bush, and one appointed by Barack Obama.

• Majority Opinion: The court indicated that the President did not adequately justify why military action was necessary.
• Dissenting Opinions: Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, arguing that the court overstepped its authority.

Future Implications

The ruling could pave the way for a more comprehensive examination by the appeals court, which might take several months. Until then, Trump cannot deploy National Guard troops in Illinois without state consent.

Reactions from the Administration

The White House has yet to provide an official response regarding the ruling. Justice Brett Kavanaugh also offered a separate concurring opinion aligned with the majority’s decision.

Overall, this case marks a significant moment in the legal landscape surrounding the deployment of National Guard troops and federal authority in domestic situations.