Cemetery Sells Plot Twice, Forcing Burial Reversal

The heartbreaking case of a cemetery plot sold twice has drawn public attention, raising critical questions about burial rights and the obligations of funeral service providers. Following a long and emotional struggle, Paula Tin Nyo was forced to exhume her son Tyber Harrison’s grave after it was discovered that the burial site she had purchased four years earlier was already claimed by another family.

Cemetery Plot Dispute Overview

This unusual case centers around two grieving families—the Reser family and Tin Nyo’s family—who both believed they had rightful claims to the same burial plot at Skyline Memorial Gardens in Portland, Oregon. Tyber Harrison, who tragically died on March 4, 2016, was initially buried with keepsakes, including baby teeth and parts of his ashes. However, the plot belonged to Jane and Martin Reser, who lost their son Alex on March 4, 2019, due to a fentanyl overdose.

Key Events and Parties Involved

• Date of Tyber’s Death: March 4, 2016
• Date of Alex’s Death: March 4, 2019
• Cemetery: Skyline Memorial Gardens, Portland, Oregon
• Families Involved: Tin Nyo family (Tyber Harrison) and Reser family (Alex Reser)
• Legal Representation: Attorneys for both families and Service Corporation International (the funeral company)

After a protracted court case, the judge ruled in favor of the Reser family, stating that they had the rightful claim to the cemetery plot. This legal conclusion led to the unsettling decision to disinter Tyber’s remains.

Emotional Disinterment and Public Response

On December 30, 2025, a group of approximately 30 mourners gathered at the cemetery as the grave marker for Tyber Harrison was removed. During the disinterment, Tin Nyo honored her son’s memory with flowers and spoke to him directly, expressing deep sorrow over the loss of their designated resting place.

Legal and Ethical Implications

The case has ignited discussions surrounding cemetery law and funeral home accountability. Tanya Marsh, a law professor at Wake Forest University, indicated that disputes over burial sites are rare but not unprecedented. The complexity arises from the interpretation of contracts and the definition of burial sites, particularly in cases involving cremated remains.

Service Corporation International, which manages Skyline Memorial Gardens, faced criticism for its handling of the situation. The company indicated that it had offered both families alternative sites, but both declined, preferring to keep their original locations.

Conclusion

The disinterment of Tyber Harrison shines a light on the often overlooked challenges grieving families face when navigating cemetery regulations and funeral service agreements. As two families continue to grapple with their separate yet intertwined losses, this case serves as a poignant reminder of the need for clearer guidelines and greater empathy in the funeral industry.