Trump Reshapes Venezuela Policy as New Zealand Confronts Foreign Policy Challenges

Donald Trump’s recent intervention in Venezuela has reignited discussions around foreign policy, particularly in New Zealand. This perceived act of regime change raises questions about New Zealand’s alignment with the United States.

US Intervention in Venezuela: A New Challenge

The Trump administration has taken significant steps to reshape policy towards Venezuela. The January 3 military operation aimed at capturing President Nicolás Maduro underscored the aggressive tactics employed by the United States. This operation was preceded by a buildup of military forces and numerous attacks targeting alleged drug vessels in the region since September 2025.

Trump’s rhetoric suggests intentions to involve US companies in revitalizing Venezuela’s oil sector, potentially gaining access to the world’s largest oil reserves. He mentioned that the US will “run” Venezuela until a safe transition of power is established. The meaning of this intervention remains unclear.

Implications of the Monroe Doctrine

The actions taken by the Trump administration align with the updated version of the Monroe Doctrine, as outlined in its National Security Strategy from December of the previous year. This strategy intends to reassert US dominance in the Western Hemisphere, reflecting a historical approach to geopolitical influence.

• The Monroe Doctrine historically divided the world into spheres of influence controlled by greater powers.
• Trump’s intervention raises legal concerns regarding international and US federal law.
• The US Constitution grants Congress the authority to declare war, yet Congress was seemingly not informed of these actions.

The United Nations Charter also restricts interventions in the internal affairs of sovereign nations unless international peace and security are threatened. The situation in Venezuela did not meet such criteria, indicating potential violations of international law.

Impact on International Relations

New Zealand’s response to these developments reflects its commitment to international law. Foreign Minister Winston Peters emphasized the need for all parties to adhere to legal frameworks amidst these tumultuous events.

However, New Zealand may face pressure to clarify its stance on Trump’s intervention, as appearing indifferent could encourage similar actions by other nations. The mixed signals around foreign issues, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, complicate the global geopolitical landscape. How the US addresses regional conflicts could influence other powerful nations, particularly concerning Taiwan.

A Turning Point for New Zealand

Historically, New Zealand has supported a multilateral international system focused on consensus and equality among states. Yet, there are growing concerns that closer alignment with the “America First” agenda undermines these principles.

The government has notably moderated its voice on key international issues, demonstrating a cautious approach. This has included minimal public support for allies facing territorial disputes and a reluctance to criticize US foreign policy decisions.

New Zealand now finds itself at a crossroads. It must choose between continuing a strategy aligned with the Trump administration’s approach or advocating for a more equitable, rules-based international order.

Conclusion

The Venezuelan situation presents New Zealand with a moment of reckoning. As the global political landscape shifts, New Zealand must decide how it wants to navigate its foreign affairs, especially in light of the evolving dynamics of superpower influence.