Hilton Drops Minnesota Hotel Amid ICE Controversy

The recent controversy surrounding a Minnesota Hampton Inn has led Hilton to sever ties with the hotel. This decision follows a viral video claiming an employee refused to accommodate personnel from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Hilton’s Response to the Incident

On a Tuesday announcement, Hilton stated its commitment to providing a welcoming environment for all guests. The company clarified that it takes such matters seriously and is addressing franchisee conduct to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Background of the Incident

The situation escalated after the Department of Homeland Security reported that the Hampton Inn in Lakewood, Minnesota, denied room reservations to ICE agents. This revelation was further amplified by a video posted by conservative activist Nick Sortor on the platform X.

Details of the Video

• Sortor attempted to check in at approximately 11 p.m. local time.
• He presented a government rate request for DHS employees.
• The front desk staff declined to process the request, citing the hotel’s policy against ICE reservations.

Reactions and Backlash

The incident has ignited backlash, particularly among conservative circles. Calls for a boycott of Hilton Hotels have emerged, reminiscent of previous campaigns against brands like Bud Light and Target.

Comments from Officials

• New Hampshire Representative James Spillane expressed his disappointment as a long-time Hilton Honors member, declaring his intention to boycott.
• Billionaire investor Bill Ackman supported Hilton’s handling of the situation, reinforcing the company’s stance against discriminatory actions.

Franchise Ownership and Management

The majority of Hilton-branded hotels operate as independent franchises. The Hampton Inn involved in this controversy is managed by Everpeak Hospitality, which is now under scrutiny.

Impact on Search Trends

As news spread, online interest surged for the term “Boycott Hilton Hotels,” reflecting growing public sentiment against the chain’s handling of the incident.