Matt Kalil Addresses Divorce Claims Sparked by Ex-Wife Haley’s Allegations
Matt Kalil, former NFL player, has initiated legal action against his ex-wife, Haley Baylee, following her viral statements regarding his anatomy. Baylee claimed in a Twitch interview in November 2025 that Kalil’s size was a significant factor in their separation in 2022. The lawsuit, filed on a Tuesday and reported by TMZ, accuses Baylee of making degrading comments that have led to unwanted public scrutiny.
Details of the Lawsuit
Kalil, aged 36, has charged Baylee, 33, with invasion of privacy and unjust enrichment. He contends that her remarks have not only attracted invasive public commentary but also negatively impacted his family and new wife, Keilani Asmus. According to court documents, Asmus has received alarming messages stemming from Baylee’s comments.
Claimed Damages
- Kalil is seeking damages exceeding $75,000.
- He asserts that Baylee has gained financially and received increased online traffic due to her statements.
Background on Kalil and Baylee
The couple began dating in 2012 after Kalil was drafted by the Minnesota Vikings and married in a lavish Hawaii ceremony in 2015. Their marriage, however, faced challenges, leading Baylee to file for divorce in May 2022, citing irreconcilable differences.
Baylee’s Public Comments
In her Twitch conversation with streamer Marlon Garcia, Baylee described Kalil’s size as “like .01 percent of the population.” She elaborated on their relationship, mentioning attempts at therapy and personal growth. Baylee expressed regret that only a portion of their livestream discussion was highlighted.
Baylee’s Response
In response to the escalating situation, Baylee stated she values her ex-husband’s privacy and the integrity of their past relationship. She noted that their extensive talk encompassed more than what has been amplified in the media.
Kalil’s New Ventures
Meanwhile, Kalil received a substantial offer from the adult webcam platform CamSoda for their “Big Confidence” campaign. The campaign aims to empower men to embrace their stories and humorously confront viral moments.
This legal battle reflects the ongoing complexities of personal relationships, particularly under the scrutiny of social media. As the case develops, both parties navigate the fallout from their past and the implications of public commentary.