Ex-Editor Paul Dacre Denies Knowledge of Police Bribe in Prince Harry Case
In a high-profile legal case, former Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre testified regarding allegations of police bribery involving Prince Harry and other claimants. The inquiry focused on Dacre’s connection to claims that his newspaper participated in unethical journalistic practices.
Key Details from Dacre’s Testimony
- Date of Testimony: Recent proceedings in a London court.
- Key Figure: Paul Dacre, a significant figure in Fleet Street journalism.
- Main Topics: Alleged police bribery, ethical journalism standards, and Dacre’s editorial practices.
Dacre’s Response to Allegations
During his testimony, Dacre expressed deep frustration regarding the accusations. However, his demeanor was calm and controlled, showing little of the emotional intensity suggested in the witness statements. He highlighted that he was not personally involved in verifying the authenticity of the majority of stories published.
Editorial Practices and Technology Use
Dacre described his approach to editorial management. He maintained a demanding environment, offering competitive salaries while enforcing strict disciplinary measures. His claim that he lacked a comprehensive understanding of technology further illustrated his approach to news gathering.
He characterized himself as a “techno-phobe,” revealing his limited experience with modern computing, stating he did not use personal computers, which he described as “antediluvian.” His testimony reflected a sense of detachment from the methods employed by journalists under his leadership.
Commitment to Ethical Journalism
One of the more surprising aspects of Dacre’s testimony was his assertion of being a proponent of journalistic integrity. He claimed to have taken action against potentially unethical practices as soon as they came to his attention. Dacre professed a commitment to the ethical standards of journalism, often expressing concern when stories seemed questionable.
His frequent refrain, “I smell danger here,” was intended to reinforce his proactive stance on editorial integrity.
Conclusion of the Proceedings
Despite the high expectations from the claimants, represented by lawyer David Sherborne, the testimony did not yield significant revelations. Dacre maintained a composed presence throughout and refrained from engaging deeply with the allegations, leaving many unanswered questions as the case progresses.
Ultimately, this testimony highlights ongoing concerns about journalistic ethics and the role of editors in overseeing story legitimacy in the British media landscape.
