Lidl Worker Fired for Drinking 17p Water Bottle
A recent case involving a Lidl employee has raised discussions about workplace policies and the concept of fairness regarding employee dismissals. The case centered around Julian Oxborough, who was terminated after consuming a 17p bottle of water while working at the checkout of the Wincanton store.
Incident Overview
The incident occurred on July 19, 2024. Mr. Oxborough, who had been with Lidl for over a decade, drank from a discarded bottle. This bottle had been left at the checkout by a customer who exchanged it for another with a barcode. Mr. Oxborough, feeling dehydrated during his shift, used the discarded bottle to replenish his personal drink.
Investigation and Dismissal
The following day, a manager discovered the bottle and suspected it violated company policy. A review of surveillance footage led to Mr. Oxborough’s suspension while an investigation into alleged gross misconduct began. During this inquiry, he explained that he was worried about his health due to dehydration, as he found his personal drink too strong. He also believed the bottle could be discarded without cause, having seen similar bottles in the staff canteen.
When questioned about payment for the water, Mr. Oxborough admitted uncertainty, stating, “No, I think I may have forgot or can’t actually remember taking it.” He described his actions as an honest mistake, attributing them to stress and haste at the end of his shift.
Tribunal Findings
The Employment Tribunal in Southampton reviewed the case, ultimately ruling against Mr. Oxborough’s claim of unfair dismissal. Employment Judge Yallop emphasized that Mr. Oxborough provided inconsistent accounts regarding his intent to purchase or write off the water. Karina Moon, the area manager overseeing the disciplinary process, noted that he failed to acknowledge the policy on unpaid items despite having several days to reflect on the incident.
Lidl’s Response
A Lidl spokesperson stated that dismissing a long-term employee is never taken lightly. They reinforced their commitment to maintaining a strict policy against the consumption of unpaid stock, highlighting the importance of consistent adherence to company rules.
Conclusion
This incident serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding workplace policies and the treatment of employees. It highlights the need for clear communication and understanding of such policies, particularly in high-stress scenarios.
