Consumers Boycott Amazon, Google, Netflix: Discover the Reasons Why

In response to ongoing operations by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a new boycott movement named “Resist and Unsubscribe” has gained momentum. This initiative calls for consumers to withdraw their support from major tech companies actively involved in enabling ICE. Participants are encouraged to cancel subscriptions, delete apps, and share their actions on social media.

Understanding the ‘Resist and Unsubscribe’ Boycott

Launched by Scott Galloway, the “Resist and Unsubscribe” campaign aims to protest against ICE’s controversial operations. The trigger for this boycott was a series of incidents in Minnesota that resulted in the deaths of two U.S. citizens by federal agents, sparking protests across the country. The goal is to exert economic pressure on the administration, as Galloway believes a coordinated economic strike can effectively convey the public’s discontent.

Key Companies Targeted in the Boycott

• Amazon
• Google
• Apple
• Netflix
• Meta
• Microsoft
• Uber
• Paramount+
• OpenAI
• X (formerly Twitter)

The boycott also identifies companies that are viewed as “active enablers of ICE.” These include:

• AT&T
• Comcast
• Charter Communications (Spectrum)
• Dell
• FedEx
• Lowe’s
• The Home Depot
• Marriott
• UPS

Actions to Participate in the Boycott

The official website of the boycott provides a list of suggested actions. Participants can:

• Unsubscribe from listed tech services.
• Delete unwanted applications from their devices.
• Avoid engaging with ads from these companies.
• Spread awareness of the boycott through social media.

Galloway encourages followers to share their commitment to the boycott by using social media hashtags such as #resistandunsubscribe and #resistICE. This collective action aims to amplify the voices of consumers during this politically charged period.

Conclusion

The “Resist and Unsubscribe” boycott illustrates a growing trend of consumer activism targeting major corporations. Participants believe that by disrupting the economic support for these companies, they can influence change regarding the treatment of immigration policies in the United States. As political tensions persist, these actions represent a significant statement from the consumer base against perceived governmental overreach.