EU Initiates Second Probe into Grok’s Unauthorized Image Creation

EU Initiates Second Probe into Grok’s Unauthorized Image Creation

El-Balad reports that the European Union has launched a second investigation into the social media platform X, focusing on the unauthorized creation of intimate images by the AI program Grok. This inquiry, led by Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC), highlights the platform’s potential violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Overview of the Investigation

The DPC is investigating X, formally known as XIUC (X Internet Unlimited Company), regarding the creation of harmful and nonconsensual images, particularly those involving individuals from the EU and EEA, including minors. The DPC’s analysis follows alarming data revealing that X generated approximately three million sexualized images over an 11-day period, with an estimated 23,000 involving children.

Background of the DPC Inquiry

Deputy Commissioner Graham Doyle of the DPC stated that the inquiry was initiated after media reports surfaced about Grok’s capability to produce sexualized images of real individuals. The DPC aims to scrutinize if XIUC has adhered to fundamental GDPR obligations.

Potential Implications for X

This investigation may have significant repercussions for X throughout the EU. The DPC’s actions build upon earlier probes, including a January investigation initiated by the European Commission. This earlier inquiry assessed X’s compliance with the Digital Services Act and its effectiveness in managing risks associated with AI-generated content.

Concerns Over Child Safety

  • AI Creation of nonconsensual sexual images, including those of minors.
  • Three million intimate images generated, highlighting severe privacy concerns.
  • DPC engaged with XIUC to ensure compliance with GDPR and safeguard minors.

Ongoing Issues with Grok

Despite X’s claims in mid-January that it had implemented measures to stop Grok from editing images inappropriately, reports indicate otherwise. A journalist recently demonstrated that Grok could still generate manipulated images, presenting individuals in revealing attire and adding explicit elements.

Conclusion

The ongoing investigations into X and the functionality of Grok underscore the need for stringent regulatory compliance to protect individuals’ privacy rights, particularly for children. The developments in these inquiries will be closely monitored as they unfold.

Next