Berlinale Jury Declines to Condemn Israel Over Gaza ‘Genocide’

Tricia Tuttle, director of the 76th Berlin International Film Festival, has defended the festival’s jury against criticism related to the ongoing Gaza conflict. The festival has faced backlash for the jury’s refusal to label the situation in Gaza as “genocide.” Tuttle argued that artistic expression and political discourse can take various forms, and she emphasized the importance of free speech at the Berlinale.

Berlinale Jury’s Stance on Gaza Conflict

During an opening press conference, jury president Wim Wenders stated that filmmakers should remain apolitical and serve as a counterbalance to politics. Responding to a journalist’s query about the German government’s role in the Gaza conflict, Wenders maintained that filmmakers shouldn’t engage in political debates. He highlighted the challenges of addressing human rights selectively within the context of the festival.

Comments from Jury Members

In light of the controversy, jury member Ewa Puszczyńska expressed that films may not align with conventional definitions of politics. She remarked that filmmakers engage with audiences on complex issues without necessarily endorsing specific political decisions. Puszczyńska stressed the difficulty of framing such inquiries directed at artists.

• Jury Members:
  • Wim Wenders (president)
  • Shivendra Singh Dungarpur
  • Min Bahadur Bham
  • Bae Doona
  • Ewa Puszczyńska
  • HIKARI
  • Reinaldo Marcus Green

Amidst the criticism, author Arundhati Roy withdrew her film from the festival. She condemned the jury’s response, labeling it as an attempt to stifle open discussions about serious humanitarian issues. Roy firmly stated that the situation in Gaza constituted a genocide against the Palestinian people, implicating various governments in the ongoing conflict.

Festival’s Response to Backlash

Tuttle’s recent comments hinted at the negative effects of the public discourse surrounding the festival. She expressed concern that an environment of constant scrutiny may deter potential participants, who might question whether they are attending for artistic expression or political debate.

Last year’s festival included a vigil to support captives, and Tuttle continues to advocate for artists to engage with pressing global issues. Cinematic exploration remains an essential avenue for dialogue, even amid complex political landscapes.