Roger Ebert Critiques Liam Neeson and Leonard Nimoy Film Collaboration
Roger Ebert, renowned film critic, had notable opinions throughout his career, including some baffling takes. One significant review was for the 1988 film “The Good Mother,” an adaptation of Sue Miller’s novel. While the book received acclaim, Ebert criticized the film harshly, describing it as having “the best of intentions and the worst of screenplays.” His review highlighted the film’s confused message and lack of clarity.
Film Overview
“The Good Mother” featured Diane Keaton as Anna Dunlop, a piano teacher navigating life post-divorce from her husband Brian, played by James Naughton. Liam Neeson appeared as Leo Cutter, a carefree Irish sculptor who becomes involved with Anna.
Plot Synopsis
- Anna Dunlop, a single mother, struggles to support her daughter, Molly.
- Leo Cutter charms Anna, leading to romantic entanglements.
- A controversial scene depicts inappropriate behavior, ultimately leading to legal custody battles.
Ebert expressed dismay at how the film tackled sensitive topics. He noted that the narrative attempted to challenge societal norms regarding sexuality and custody but missed the mark entirely. According to him, the film seemingly portrayed Anna and Leo as victims of an oppressive court system without addressing the implications of their actions.
Criticism of Direction and Writing
Directed by Leonard Nimoy, the film struggled to convey its intended message. Ebert remarked on the lack of coherence and questioned whether the filmmakers fully understood their own story. He gave “The Good Mother” a mere one-star rating, pinpointing its deficiencies in storytelling and execution.
Key Issues Identified by Ebert
- The critical bathroom scene, pivotal to the plot, was not shown, leaving viewers puzzled.
- The courtroom drama contained elements of an “Idiot Plot,” detracting from the film’s overall credibility.
In conclusion, while “The Good Mother” aimed to provoke thought on important societal issues, Ebert’s critique underscored its failure to effectively communicate those themes. He encapsulated the film’s shortcomings by stating it was full of passion but devoid of a clear message.
