Contempt Threat: Zuckerberg’s Team Wears Meta AI Glasses in No-Recording Courtroom

At a recent high-profile trial in Los Angeles, Mark Zuckerberg faced scrutiny over the role of social media in youth addiction. The courtroom drama intensified when Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl threatened to cite members of Zuckerberg’s team for contempt after they wore Meta AI glasses that can record video.

Contempt Threat Over Meta AI Glasses

The judge issued a serious warning, stating, “If you have done that, you must delete that, or you will be held in contempt of the court.” The Meta glasses worn by Zuckerberg’s executive assistant, Andrea Besmehn, and another individual sparked immediate concern regarding courtroom protocol, as recording is prohibited.

Key Details of the Trial

• The trial centers on allegations that social media companies, including Meta and YouTube, purposely design platforms to engage young users.
• A 20-year-old plaintiff, referred to as “KGM” or “Kaley,” claims she developed mental health issues stemming from social media addiction.
• Prior to the trial, TikTok and Snap reached settlements with the plaintiff.

Mark Zuckerberg’s Public Image Under Scrutiny

During the proceedings, Zuckerberg was questioned about his public persona. Plaintiff’s attorney Mark Lanier referenced an internal document suggesting Meta staff encouraged Zuckerberg to appear more genuine in media appearances. Zuckerberg denied any coaching, labeling the remarks as mere feedback.

He acknowledged his struggle with public speaking, noting, “I think I’m actually well known to be very bad at this,” to some laughter from the courtroom.

Zuckerberg’s Perspective on Social Media Addiction

When questioned about whether addictive platforms lead to increased usage, Zuckerberg replied, “I don’t think that applies here.” He faced criticism for his previous statements about Instagram’s engagement strategies, especially in light of conflicting internal documents that suggested a goal to increase user engagement time to 40 minutes in 2023 and 46 minutes by 2026.

Youth Safety Concerns

The discussions also touched on Instagram’s policies regarding users under age 13. Zuckerberg admitted some users lie about their age when creating accounts. He insisted that Meta actively removes underage users, while further asserting that age verification is better suited for platforms like Apple and Google.

As the trial continues, Meta maintains its stance against the allegations. A company spokesperson expressed confidence in their commitment to protecting young users amidst ongoing scrutiny.

Ongoing Legal Challenges

This trial is not the only legal challenge Meta faces. Another case in New Mexico, initiated by the state’s attorney general, accuses the company of not adequately preventing child exploitation on its platforms. The outcomes of these trials could significantly impact Meta’s future operations and public image.