Drainville Firmly Insists on Permanent Position

Bassyonni

Published: February 24, 2026 7:10 AM ET

Drainville Firmly Insists on Permanent Position

In a recent interview, Bernard Drainville firmly expressed his support for the elimination of permanent positions in the public service. He argued that removing job security could lead to a more efficient state administration. Drainville emphasized the need for the government to make difficult decisions regarding employment. He stated, “We must be able to tell a public servant we no longer need them.”

Drainville’s Perspective on Public Sector Employment

Drainville’s comments reflect a broader debate on the role of permanent positions within the public sector. He suggests that such roles often protect older employees, limiting the ability to let go of staff when necessary. His experience as the Environment Minister last autumn, where he oversaw numerous layoffs, reinforced this view. Many of the positions eliminated were held by younger workers, leaving older employees insulated from job loss.

The Risk of Favoritism in Public Service

Drainville pointed out that the principle of job security originally aimed to reduce political favoritism in public sector hiring. However, he believes the current system in Quebec may be more inflexible compared to federal standards, potentially hindering administrative efficiency. This rigidity could lead to favoritism under the guise of job protection, undermining the intention behind permanent positions.

Historical Context and Personal Experience

Reflecting on his personal journey, Drainville has experienced the complexities surrounding employment in public service. After leaving Radio-Canada for politics in 2007, he sought a leave of absence to maintain his employment link. In 2009, an arbitration ruling dismissed his attempt to contest the termination of his employment, affirming the need for the government to make administrative decisions in workforce management.

Conclusion: A Shift in Public Sector Policy?

Drainville’s current stance raises critical questions about the future of public sector employment in Quebec. As debates continue, it remains to be seen whether a shift away from permanent positions can effectively streamline government operations while balancing the protections needed for public servants.