Charlie Puth and the Studio in Your Pocket: Inside His New Role at Moises

Charlie Puth and the Studio in Your Pocket: Inside His New Role at Moises

On a night when practice can mean the difference between confidence and doubt, charlie puth has described loading tracks into Moises to rehearse, test different keys, and shape decisions that would otherwise demand time, money, or a full studio setup. Now, the Grammy-nominated singer has taken that private workflow into public view—named chief music officer of the AI-powered music platform Moises, as the entertainment industry continues to grapple with what artificial intelligence should and should not do for artists.

What is Charlie Puth’s new role at Moises, and what will he do?

Moises announced that Charlie Puth has been tapped as its chief music officer, a role centered on guiding the platform’s creative and product direction. In practical terms, Moises has said he will help steer how the tools evolve, collaborate on artist-focused features, and bring the perspective of a working musician into the product decisions that shape how users practice, perform, and produce.

tied to the announcement, Puth framed the tool as a shortcut to capabilities that once required “hours or expensive studio setups. ” He pointed to isolating vocals to study technique and experimenting with arrangements in real time—uses that sit closer to practice and iteration than to replacing the act of making music.

How does Moises use AI—and why are musicians debating it?

Moises, founded in 2019 as an AI-powered service marketed to musicians, is primarily used to isolate vocals and instruments—an often necessary step in remixing or sampling. The company also touts tools to detect and change song keys, and to detect and generate the correct guitar chords for songs.

At the same time, the wider creative world has been locked in contentious debates over regulating AI, with many artists wary—especially where content generation capabilities are involved and where voices and likenesses might be used without consent. In that landscape, Moises’ leadership has sought to draw a line between assistance and automation. CEO Geraldo Ramos said he wants to differentiate Moises from AI music generators “where you can just bang the keyboard and get a full song, ” emphasizing that the product does not offer a one-prompt, zero-to-finished-track solution.

Moises has also expanded into generative features: last year it built an AI-augmented music studio that allows users to generate song stems—the individual music files that make up tracks—by inputting text prompts or their own audio snippets as references. Ramos described the approach as generating “building blocks of music, ” offering an example of starting with a guitar and requesting a bass part that fits. His argument is about keeping the human in the driver’s seat: the artist begins with intent and material, and the tool supports the next step.

What did Charlie Puth say about AI, and why did some fans push back?

In his statement, charlie puth said he has been using Moises “for years” and claimed “every musician I know” uses it. He argued that “AI, when done right, isn’t here to replace musicians. It’s here to help artists learn, explore, and bring their ideas to life. ”

But the announcement drew mixed reactions from fans. One critical response on X, referencing a since-deleted post from Puth about the news, read: “Boo!!! We declared Charlie Puth should quit being an artist. ” Other reactions leaned toward cautious optimism, including a post expressing hope that Moises only uses ethically sourced noises and music while calling Puth a “great song-writer. ”

That split—between fear of replacement and hope for responsible tools—sits at the heart of today’s AI music conversation. Recent months have also seen AI companies push to strike licensing deals with talent across sectors, as part of efforts to avoid blowback from artists concerned about unauthorized use of their identities.

What happens next: the Moises Jam Session contest and the album timeline

The partnership is being kicked off with a contest: Puth will personally choose the best remix or cover of his new single Beat Yourself Up through Moises Jam Session, with submissions open through March. The contest ties the announcement to an immediate, concrete use case—inviting musicians and fans to manipulate song elements in a controlled setting rather than treating AI as an abstract debate.

Moises has said the platform has more than 70 million users worldwide, placing Puth’s new role at the intersection of celebrity influence and a large, existing creator base. Ramos also said Puth used the platform ahead of his Super Bowl national anthem performance, using it to practice and experiment with different keys and other elements for his upcoming album.

Puth’s fourth studio album, Whatever’s Clever!, is set to release March 27. As that date approaches, the story around his appointment is likely to remain bigger than one artist’s career move: it is a test of whether AI tools marketed as musician-first can earn trust in a field shaped by both tradition and constant technological change.

Image caption (alt text): Charlie Puth announces a new chief music officer role at Moises as musicians debate how AI tools should support creativity.

Next