NFL Media Gives Mixed Reviews on Bengals’ Jonathan Allen Signing
The Cincinnati Bengals have recently strengthened their defensive line by signing Jonathan Allen, a 31-year-old defensive tackle. This move comes after a difficult previous season for the Bengals’ defense. The team secured Allen through a two-year contract worth $26 million, which could potentially rise to $28 million.
Jonathan Allen’s Career at a Glance
Allen, known for his time with the Washington Commanders and the Minnesota Vikings, has had a notable career. His performance has varied in recent seasons, raising some concerns about his effectiveness on the field. Over the past three years, his Pro Football Focus (PFF) grades have consistently been below 60.
Statistical Overview
- 2024 Season with Commanders: 3 sacks, 13th percentile pass rush win rate.
- 2025 Season with Vikings: 3.5 sacks, 32nd percentile pass rush win rate.
- Total pressures: 34 and 26 over the last two seasons.
Despite a significant drop in performance, Allen previously enjoyed a stretch of four consecutive seasons with at least 45 pressures. His experience and leadership could be beneficial for a Bengals team looking to enhance its defensive capabilities.
Mixed Reactions to the Signing
Analysts have reacted variably to the Bengals’ decision to sign Allen. Different outlets have provided grades that reflect skepticism about the move.
Outlet Reviews
- Sports Illustrated: C+ They point out Cincinnati’s efforts to improve defense this week but label Allen a declining talent.
- ESPN: D The review notes that Allen’s previous performance does not justify the salary and raises concerns about his production drop.
- PFF: Below Average This analysis emphasizes Allen’s struggles, particularly against the run, questioning the investment made by the Bengals.
While Allen has potential, with hopes of rekindling past performance, the overall consensus suggests that the Bengals might be overpaying for a player whose best days may be behind him.