Nhl Scores: Poehling’s overtime goal gives Ducks a 3-1 series lead after review

Ryan Poehling’s overtime winner in Anaheim gave the Ducks a 3-1 lead after a frame-by-frame review in Toronto, and sparked debate across nhl scores and social feeds.

Published
2 Min Read
Ducks rally to win Game 4 in OT, push Oilers to brink in West 1st Round | NHL.com
Advertisement

scored the overtime goal in Sunday night at Honda Center, a play that handed the a surprising 3-1 series lead over the .

The on-ice officials — and — initially ruled that the puck had crossed the goal line, prompting a brief on-ice huddle while the Ducks started celebrating. The ’s situation room in Toronto then reviewed the play, using frame-by-frame replay to confirm that the puck had indeed crossed the line after trickling past Oilers goaltender .

Video reviewed during the decision showed a small portion of the puck covered by Jarry’s skate when the replay was conducted. League sources said the outcome would have been far more controversial if Brenk and St-Laurent had not first ruled the puck a goal on the ice. A camera placed inside the crossbar directly above the goal line supplied footage that increased confidence in the decision.

- Advertisement -

The goal — awarded after the Toronto review — gave Anaheim a 3-1 lead in the Western Conference first-round playoff series. The puck was across the line for only a fraction of a second before being swept away by an Oilers player, a detail the replay crew examined frame by frame as part of the review protocol.

That protocol leans on the call made by on-ice officials; when referees signal a goal, the situation room seeks confirmation rather than reversing a clear on-ice ruling. The league does not make its officials available to speak postgame to provide context or clarity on goal calls, a practice that left the decision and its mechanics subject to immediate public scrutiny by Monday morning.

The aftermath revealed a tension point inside the review procedure. One league source suggested the rulebook could someday be amended so on-ice officials would not be required to make a goal call if they are unsure — an idea that surfaced as fans and analysts revisited the frame-by-frame evidence. By contrast, others pointed to the initial on-ice call and the camera angle above the goal line as decisive in avoiding a far messier dispute.

By the time the review was complete, Anaheim players had already begun celebrating in the Honda Center and the Ducks had taken control of the series. The result shifts pressure back to Edmonton, which now faces the prospect of staving off elimination with the series headed back across roughly 2,500 miles to Alberta. The questions left after Sunday night are narrow and consequential: whether the replay process, anchored to on-ice rulings and supported by specialized camera angles, will be judged sufficient by fans and teams as the series moves forward, and whether one brief crossing of the line will be remembered as a turning point in this playoff matchup.

- Advertisement -
Advertisement
TAGGED:
Share This Article