27 States Shared Sensitive Food Stamp Data with USDA, Reports NPR

In a significant move affecting food assistance programs, at least 27 states have shared sensitive information about Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). This data includes names, dates of birth, home addresses, Social Security numbers, and benefit amounts. The data transfer has raised concerns surrounding privacy and the potential misuse of information.
Overview of SNAP Data Sharing
Since late July, Democratic-led states resisted demands from the Trump administration to submit personal data on food assistance recipients dating back to 2020. However, Republican-led states complied, resulting in millions of individuals’ information being transferred. Approximately 42 million Americans rely on SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, for nutritional support.
Legal Controversy Surrounding Data Request
The USDA justified the data request by stating its goal was to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. Opponents, including various Democratic officials, argue that this request is unlawful and a violation of privacy rights. A recent court ruling by U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney temporarily blocks the Trump administration from penalizing states for not complying with the data submission.
States Involved in Data Sharing
- Republican-led states have completed data submissions.
- North Carolina, despite having a Democratic governor, also complied.
- As of August 12, numerous states, including Nebraska and Ohio, submitted extensive data on their SNAP recipients.
Data Compiled and Statistics
Over 15.7 million individuals enrolled in SNAP from 27 states participated in the data transfer in May. Key statistics include:
- Nebraska: 437,500 individuals (12.5 million lines of data)
- Ohio: Data submitted for approximately 3.1 million recipients
- Texas: More than 3.7 million individuals’ data shared
Privacy Concerns and Government Surveillance
Critics express fears about the government’s use of the data, especially regarding surveillance activities. A representative from Pennsylvania’s Department of Human Services noted that their agency sought clarity on the use and security of shared data but received no satisfactory answers.
Implications for SNAP Recipients
Many recipients worry about the potential for wrongful allegations of fraud. Concerns grew as the USDA threatened states with the loss of substantial federal funds if they did not comply with the data request.
Future of SNAP and Data Management
The ongoing legal battle highlights the broader implications for federal-state relationships, especially with data management in programs like SNAP. Political analysts suggest that the current administration’s approach deviates from the traditional norms of federal-state cooperation.
As the situation develops, the protection of sensitive personal information and the intended use of shared data remain critical issues for SNAP recipients and state governments alike.