NBA Cup 2025 Court Designs Ranked: From Worst (Hawks) to Best

ago 8 hours
NBA Cup 2025 Court Designs Ranked: From Worst (Hawks) to Best

The NBA Cup has become an anticipated highlight of the basketball season, evolving from the traditional regular-season schedule. In December 2023, the Los Angeles Lakers secured their championship by defeating the Indiana Pacers in this annual tournament, formerly known as the NBA In-Season Tournament. The event was rebranded as the Emirates NBA Cup following a multiyear partnership with the airline. Last year’s champions, the Milwaukee Bucks, triumphed over the Oklahoma City Thunder.

This year’s tournament cycle continues through November 28, with matchups every Friday. Eight teams will qualify for knockout stages leading to semifinals on December 13 and a championship game on December 16, both to be held in Las Vegas.

An intriguing aspect of the NBA Cup is the unique court designs representing all 30 franchises. Designed by artist Victor Solomon, these courts have sparked varied reactions from fans and critics. A ranking compiled by The Athletic’s experts categorized these courts from least to most favored based on aesthetic appeal.

NBA Cup 2025 Court Designs Ranked

Rankings Overview

  • 30. Atlanta Hawks (22 points) – Excessive use of red is deemed distracting.
  • 29. Houston Rockets (25 points) – Critics describe the design as dark and uninviting.
  • 28. Toronto Raptors (34 points) – The repeated “We the North” catchphrase feels excessive.
  • 27. Oklahoma City Thunder (35 points) – Described as boring and lacking creativity.
  • 26. Sacramento Kings (39 points) – A gray court that fails to inspire.
  • 25. New Orleans Pelicans (40 points) – A blue court garners mixed reviews.
  • 24. Golden State Warriors (41 points) – The design receives criticism for its dullness.
  • 23. Denver Nuggets (43 points) – The court’s themes lack excitement.
  • 21 (tie). Miami Heat (44 points) – Described as bland and lacking character.
  • 21 (tie). Dallas Mavericks (44 points) – Criticized for a feeling of incompleteness.
  • 19 (tie). Cleveland Cavaliers (45 points) – Points awarded for logo incorporation but criticized for the color scheme.
  • 19 (tie). LA Clippers (45 points) – The large logo and colors receive mixed reviews.
  • 18. Detroit Pistons (47 points) – Noted for referencing area codes but lacking historical elements.
  • 17. Brooklyn Nets (54 points) – The herringbone motif generates divisive opinions.
  • 15 (tie). Memphis Grizzlies (58 points) – The color scheme is praised while the repetitive design draws criticism.
  • 15 (tie). Chicago Bulls (58 points) – A dull design but with functionality for viewing the game.
  • 14. Charlotte Hornets (59 points) – The teal color scheme captivates but may overwhelm viewers.
  • 13. Minnesota Timberwolves (64 points) – The calming colors evoke relaxation.
  • 12. Boston Celtics (77 points) – Recognized for historical touches, but the green creates debate.
  • 11. Philadelphia 76ers (79 points) – Some fonts distract but the design generally works well.
  • 10. Milwaukee Bucks (80 points) – Antlers evoke mixed feelings on overall design quality.
  • 9. Utah Jazz (81 points) – Nostalgic color scheme resonates well with fans.
  • 7 (tie). Washington Wizards (82 points) – A nostalgic nod to the past earns them a tie for the top spots.
  • 7 (tie). Indiana Pacers (82 points) – The design honors former coaching legends effectively.
  • 6. Phoenix Suns (83 points) – Unique orange court stands out amidst traditional colors.
  • 5. San Antonio Spurs (90 points) – A contemporary spin on classic colors pleases the critics.
  • 4. Los Angeles Lakers (98 points) – Traditional color scheme emphasizes franchise legacy.
  • 3. New York Knicks (103 points) – Skyline design received commendation for classic representation.
  • 1 (tie). Orlando Magic (104 points) – Effective use of team colors and icons wins praise.
  • 1 (tie). Portland Trail Blazers (104 points) – A standout design resonates with experts and fans alike.

This year’s NBA Cup courts have ignited passionate discussions among fans. The varying reactions to each design reveal the challenges of balancing creativity and practicality in sports aesthetics. As the tournament progresses, all eyes will be on these unique courts and how they influence the viewing experience.