Judge Rejects Rose Bowl’s TRO Request to Block UCLA Move to SoFi
A recent ruling has significant implications for UCLA’s potential move from the Rose Bowl to SoFi Stadium. A judge denied the Rose Bowl’s request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) aimed at preventing UCLA’s relocation plans. This decision came despite an existing lease agreement between UCLA and the Rose Bowl that extends to 2044.
Judge’s Ruling on UCLA’s Move
The judge concluded that there was insufficient justification for emergency relief. Notably, UCLA’s next scheduled game at the Rose Bowl is not until the 2026 season, following their home finale on November 22. The ruling raises questions about the future of the Rose Bowl as a venue for UCLA’s home games.
Next Steps for the Rose Bowl
The court suggested that the City of Pasadena and the Rose Bowl Operating Company should gather information from UCLA regarding their discussions about a potential move to SoFi Stadium. This means a motion for a preliminary injunction could be filed before the commencement of the 2026 season.
- Lease Duration: UCLA’s lease with the Rose Bowl lasts until 2044.
- Next Game: UCLA is not scheduled to host any games until 2026.
- Future Actions: The Rose Bowl may pursue further legal actions, including a preliminary injunction.
Despite the ongoing legal matters, UCLA maintains that no final decision regarding a move to SoFi Stadium has been made. However, the prospect of a potential relocation remains open, as the discussions continue behind the scenes.
Implications of the Ruling
This ruling has broader implications for both UCLA’s athletic future and the Rose Bowl’s role as a historic sports venue. The ongoing situation reflects the evolving nature of collegiate sports and venue management.
Moreover, there are concerns regarding SoFi Stadium’s involvement. The stadium, owned by Rams owner Stan Kroenke, could be seen as having interfered with UCLA’s existing contract with the Rose Bowl. This aspect may further complicate the legal landscape.
