Government Investment in Stonehenge Tunnel Deemed Unrealistic
The Stonehenge Alliance has voiced its concerns over the government’s investment in the proposed Stonehenge Tunnel project. While they acknowledge the necessity for improved infrastructure in the area, they believe alternative solutions should have been considered.
Concerns Over Government Investment in Stonehenge Tunnel
Mike Birkin, the acting chair of the Stonehenge Alliance, emphasized the unique value of the world heritage site. He described it as a “landscape without parallel” and expressed relief regarding the potential revocation of planning permission. Birkin stated that having this permission “hanging over” the site would not benefit its preservation.
Economic Viability and Future of the Site
A spokesperson for the group highlighted the current economic climate, suggesting that expecting significant government investment in the tunnel project is unrealistic. They pointed out a 2019 report by the National Audit Office, which raised doubts about the benefits of such a tunnel.
Historical Significance of Stonehenge
Stonehenge is recognized as a UNESCO world heritage site, designated in 1986 for its outstanding universal value. The ongoing discussions about infrastructure investment in the area reflect broader debates about how best to balance development and heritage preservation.
- Site Name: Stonehenge
- UNESCO Designation: 1986
- Report Reference: National Audit Office, 2019
