Bosnian Genocide Scholars’ Silence on Gaza: A Closer Look
The ongoing conflict in Gaza has drawn sharp comparisons to historical genocides, such as the Bosnian genocide. As we observe the significant impact on global discourse, a critical examination of Bosnian genocide scholars’ responses reveals a complex and often troubling silence.
Bosnian Genocide Context
This year marks 30 years since the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina concluded. Approximately 100,000 lives were lost, with the tragic Srebrenica genocide in July 1995 highlighting the atrocities committed, as Bosnian Serb forces led by General Ratko Mladić killed over 8,000 men and boys in a United Nations-designated safe area.
Parallels Between Bosnia and Gaza
Many Bosnians, having survived their own harrowing experiences, see parallels between their past and the ongoing situation in Gaza. Despite this, a notable silence persists among many scholars of genocide in Bosnia. While some have actively protested and condemned the actions in Gaza, many others have chosen not to voice their opinions.
Voices That Speak Out
- Lejla Kreševljaković
- Sanela Čekić Bašić
- Gorana Mlinarević
- Jasna Fetahović
- Sanela Kapetanović
These professors and researchers emphasize the moral obligation to address the situation and have taken significant steps to raise awareness. Belma Buljubašić, a political science professor, criticized the double standards of political leaders who express sympathy for Srebrenica while justifying Israel’s actions as self-defense.
Critical Perspectives
Edina Bećirević of the University of Sarajevo described the genocide in Gaza as reflecting similar patterns of dehumanization seen during the Srebrenica genocide. Ahmet Alibašić, also of the University of Sarajevo, organized a seminar that compared these two instances of mass violence.
Contrasting Responses Among Scholars
In stark contrast, many scholars at the University of Sarajevo and other institutions have remained silent on the Gaza conflict. This silence is notable, especially as the International Association of Genocide Scholars recently condemned actions in Gaza as genocide.
Reasons for Silence
- Fear of professional repercussions in Western academia.
- Concerns about funding from foreign governments.
- A desire to maintain diplomatic relations that could impact Bosnia’s peace.
This silence leads to significant ethical questions about the role of scholars funded by public means, as they have a duty to uphold scientific integrity and public accountability.
The Case of Emir Suljagić
Emir Suljagić, director of the Srebrenica Memorial Center, notably stated that the situation in Gaza is “not our battle,” which drew criticism from many observers. His dismissive remarks stand in contrast to past advocacy for Ukraine, which raises concerns about consistency in moral and ethical positions.
The Price of Inaction
The reluctance of many Bosnian genocide scholars to comment on the atrocities in Gaza fuels a dangerous discourse. By failing to speak out, they contribute to a hierarchy of victimization that prioritizes specific narratives over universal principles of justice.
In a world filled with complex historical traumas, silence remains a political choice. Scholars must confront their responsibilities to advocate for truth, transparency, and accountability, ensuring that their fields remain free from political biases that could dilute their significance.
In conclusion, the call for a renewed commitment to justice and moral accountability is urgent. Scholars must rise above selective advocacy and use their voices to connect local histories with global struggles against oppression.
