Megan Thee Stallion Testifies, Tearfully Denouncing Deepfake Porn in Florida Trial

ago 59 minutes
Megan Thee Stallion Testifies, Tearfully Denouncing Deepfake Porn in Florida Trial

In a poignant courtroom session in Miami, Megan Thee Stallion expressed her emotional distress over deepfake pornography during her civil lawsuit against blogger Milagro Gramz. The Grammy-winning artist shared her feelings of defeat and mental health struggles stemming from the unauthorized use of her likeness in explicit AI-generated videos.

Megan Thee Stallion’s Testimony in Deepfake Porn Lawsuit

Megan, whose real name is Megan Pete, testified that she feels “defeated” as a result of the sexually explicit deepfake footage circulated by Gramz. This content has negatively impacted her mental well-being, as she struggles with public perception and the emotional fallout from the situation. While on the witness stand, she recalled the embarrassment and humiliation that came with seeing these representations of herself.

Accusations Against Milagro Gramz

The lawsuit alleges that Milagro Gramz, known as Milagro Cooper, acted as a “mouthpiece” and “paid surrogate” for Tory Lanez, who was convicted of shooting Megan in 2020. Gramz is accused of encouraging her large follower base on platforms like X and Instagram to view the deepfake video. This behavior is said to have been intended to harass and demean Megan, undermining her reputation following Lanez’s conviction.

  • Conviction Background: Tory Lanez, whose real name is Daystar Peterson, was sentenced to ten years in prison for the crime.
  • Personal Impact: Megan stated that the video’s existence, regardless of its authenticity, has caused her significant emotional distress.
  • Misinformation Spread: Gramz allegedly shared false claims about Megan’s character and her well-being, exacerbating the situation.

Legal Allegations

Megan’s lawsuit does not accuse Gramz of directly creating the deepfake video. Instead, it claims she “willfully and maliciously promoted” the video, pointing her followers to it in an effort to incite further scrutiny. As Megan navigates this troubling chapter, she emphasizes the ongoing toll it takes on her mental health and public image.

This case highlights the broader issues surrounding deepfake technology and its potential for misuse, particularly against vulnerable individuals. Megan’s testimony sheds light on the personal and psychological ramifications of such digital manipulations.