Pentagon Probes Sen. Mark Kelly Over Video Urging Troops to Defy Orders
The Pentagon is investigating Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona for potentially violating military law. This inquiry follows a video he released, urging military personnel to defy “illegal orders.” Kelly, a former Navy pilot and member of Congress, was not alone; six Democratic lawmakers participated in the video, which has sparked considerable controversy.
Pentagon’s Investigation Details
In a statement issued on Monday, the Pentagon expressed concerns about Kelly’s comments and their possible impact on military discipline and morale. The investigation arises under a federal law that permits the recall of retired service members by the Secretary of Defense, potentially leading to court-martial actions or administrative measures.
Context of the Video
- Kelly was among six lawmakers, including Sen. Elissa Slotkin and Representatives Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan.
- These politicians have military or intelligence backgrounds and aimed to address service members directly.
- The video received heightened attention as it coincided with increased tensions from former President Trump, who accused the lawmakers of sedition.
In the video, Kelly asserted that troops have the right to refuse unlawful orders, while others emphasized the need to uphold constitutional principles. Kelly’s involvement poses a unique situation, as he is the only retired military member among the group still under the Pentagon’s jurisdiction.
Responses and Criticism
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth remarked that Kelly’s conduct could bring discredit to the armed forces. He criticized the video, suggesting it creates confusion and could jeopardize service members’ safety. Other Senate Democrats defended Kelly, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer accusing Trump of using the Pentagon for political purposes.
- Ruben Gallego, another Arizona senator, stated, “Mark told the truth — in America, we swear an oath to the Constitution, not wannabe kings.”
Implications for Military Orders
The Pentagon emphasizes the adherence to lawful orders by military personnel. Commanders should seek legal advice when determining the legality of orders. However, individual troops often lack the same resources, relying heavily on their superiors for guidance. The “Nuremberg defense,” which suggests that following orders absolves responsibility, holds little validity in legal contexts.
Interestingly, the lawmakers did not specify any situations in the video. Moreover, their message may not have reached the intended audience, as it was shared only on X, a platform that might be less frequented by active-duty personnel.
This ongoing investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly serves as a significant reminder of the intersection between politics and military law. The situation raises questions about accountability and the role of lawmakers in addressing military directives.
