Luc Poirier Faces $800,000 Lawsuit over Bota Bota Paternity Claim
Daniel and Geneviève Emond have initiated a lawsuit against entrepreneur Luc Poirier, claiming $800,000 over disputed paternity of the Bota Bota spa. The Emonds allege that Poirier falsely claims credit for the spa’s conception in the series “Luc le milliardaire?”, aired on Crave this fall. The lawsuit was filed on November 26 in the Superior Court of Quebec.
Bota Bota Spa Background
Daniel Emond and his daughter, Geneviève, co-founded the well-known floating spa located in Old Montreal. They argue that Poirier’s statements misrepresent his involvement in the project, claiming he asserts he was the initiator and co-owner. The lawsuit emphasizes that these claims are misleading.
Details of the Lawsuit
- Claim Amount: $800,000
- Plaintiffs: Daniel Emond and Geneviève Emond
- Defendant: Luc Poirier
- Date Filed: November 26
- Court: Superior Court of Quebec
Geneviève Emond declined to comment further on the matter but stressed that Poirier’s claims do not match reality. In a phone conversation, Poirier maintained his stance, asserting that he originated the idea for the floating spa project.
Collaboration and Conflict
The legal dispute highlights their initial collaboration. In 2008, Daniel Emond opened a spa, and soon after, he connected with Poirier, who proposed transforming an old showboat into a floating spa. However, Poirier’s claim of ownership over the boat was later found to be untrue, as he only held a purchase offer.
Partnership Breakdown
The Emonds were to establish a shareholder agreement with Poirier, but this fell through due to differing visions and Poirier’s participation in the reality show “Occupation Double.” Consequently, Poirier never held financial stakes in Bota Bota.
Impact on Reputation
Following the airing of “Luc le milliardaire?”, both Daniel and Geneviève Emond faced public scrutiny regarding their role in the spa’s creation. They are seeking $300,000 each for reputational damages, in addition to $100,000 each as punitive damages. Their legal representation is provided by Norton Rose Fulbright lawyers François Fontaine and Rhita Harim.
The ongoing case will explore the validity of the claims made by Poirier and could set a precedent regarding accountability in entrepreneurial collaborations.
