Rossmann and dm Resist Backlash Over AfD Invitation
Recent events have put the spotlight on two prominent German drugstore chains, Rossmann and dm, and their responses to pressures surrounding the political party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). Raoul Roßmann, CEO of Rossmann, and Christoph Werner, CEO of dm, appeared on a television program with Markus Lanz to discuss the backlash they faced after a controversial invitation was extended to the president of the Family Entrepreneurs Association, Marie-Christine Ostermann.
Controversial Invitation Sparks Outrage
The invitation to Ostermann for a Parliamentary Evening, which would potentially include AfD politicians, led to significant backlash. Both companies faced intense criticism from supporters and opponents of the AfD. Following the uproar, campaigns emerged targeting Rossmann by the AfD and by the NGO Campact against dm.
Rossmann’s Stance on Political Engagement
Raoul Roßmann clarified his decision to withdraw Rossmann’s membership from the association. He stated, “We want to be part of associations where we can actively participate in discussions.” Roßmann emphasized the importance of avoiding collaboration with extremist parties, citing that associating with such groups could dangerously normalize their positions.
Concerns Over Political Influence
Roßmann expressed concern that by engaging with the AfD, businesses risk providing legitimacy to their platform. He remarked, “We must avoid becoming a sounding board for their ideas.” Roßmann also reflected on the broader implications of dismissing debates with various political factions.
dm’s Approach to Dissent
Christoph Werner explained that dm had already exited the association prior to the controversy. He reinforced the notion that engaging in open dialogue is essential for a healthy parliamentary democracy. Werner stated, “If we decide not to talk to certain people, we risk undermining our democratic principles.” He underscored the necessity of maintaining discourse, even with politically unpopular figures.
Reaction to Backlash
Both Rossmann and dm have faced a barrage of threats and aggressive emails following the incident. Werner described the experience as overwhelming, highlighting a pattern in the aggressive outreach targeting their social media platforms. He asserted he would not bow to pressure from activist groups and stressed that the tactics employed by organizations like Campact represent inappropriate means of influence.
- Rossmann and dm have faced backlash for their political engagements.
- Both companies emphasized the importance of dialogue in democracy.
- Roßmann and Werner refused to yield to pressure from activist organizations.
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding the invitation to the AfD highlights the challenges companies face when navigating political affiliations. Both Rossmann and dm remain firm in their commitment to independent political engagement, prioritizing open dialogue over pressure from advocacy groups.
